cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
766
Views
1
Helpful
2
Replies

Issue with Route Map in EIGRP Lab

ALI12
Level 1
Level 1

Hello Team,

I've set up an EIGRP lab in GNS3 between two sites (Site A and Site B) with dual ISPs. Everything seems to be functioning well 

A traceroute from PC-A (IP: 10.66.5.2) to Core-B (IP: 172.16.5.1) goes through ISP-1
A traceroute from PC-A (IP: 10.66.5.2) to PC-B (IP: 172.16.5.2) goes through ISP-2

However, when I applied a route-map to force traffic from PC-A to PC-B through ISP-1, it didn't work as planned.
I've attached the configuration details for reference.

Could anyone help me identify what's missing or misconfigured?

Thanks in advance!

Core-A:

interface Ethernet1/0
ip address 10.40.40.3 255.255.255.248
ip policy route-map RMAP-5
duplex full

router eigrp 10
network 10.40.40.0 0.0.0.7
network 10.66.1.0 0.0.0.255
network 10.66.2.0 0.0.0.255
network 10.66.3.0 0.0.0.255
network 10.66.4.0 0.0.0.255
network 10.66.5.0 0.0.0.255

ip access-list extended MA-V5
permit ip 10.66.5.0 0.0.0.255 host 172.16.5.2
!
route-map RMAP-5 permit 10
match ip address MA-V5
set ip next-hop 10.40.40.1

EIGRP_RMAP.png

 

PC-A.png

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

First of all you’ve applied the route map to the wrong interface it should be applied to the interface of the original source (loopback)
also please remember PBR ONLY affects the traffic towards the destination not the return traffic as such you have the potential to incurr asymmetric routing 


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2

First of all you’ve applied the route map to the wrong interface it should be applied to the interface of the original source (loopback)
also please remember PBR ONLY affects the traffic towards the destination not the return traffic as such you have the potential to incurr asymmetric routing 


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

Hi @paul driver 

I wanted to thank you for your continued support.

After applying the route map to the interface of the original source (E1/1), everything is now working normally.

Thanks again for your help!