03-28-2009 06:37 AM - edited 03-04-2019 04:08 AM
I am looking at setting up a new WAN connection for a client. This would involve redundant 2gb (could scale to 10GE) IpVPN connections using BGP for failover. I am assuming the the ISP will offer a 10GE links for the connection.
In order to save costs, I would like to stay away from the big iron (6500 etc...). Does anybody know how a 3560e-12D would scale in this situation? Would it be able to provide L3 routing and a small BGP table?
The network would look like this:
2 x 3650e-12D switches with a 10GE trunk between them. Each switch would be uplinked to an ISP router (10GE) and running BGP. Each switch would also be plugged into an ASA5580-40 (running A/S failover).
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-28-2009 08:16 AM
Will those switches be accepting full Internet routing tables? Or is this a MP-BGP deployment over an MPLS cloud, in which the only BGP routes being learned would be the ones advertised by the remote site?
[EDIT] Just re-read and noticed that you said "small BGP table." Sorry. and yes, the 3560 does support layer 3 switching in its "IP Services" and "Advanced IP Services" feature sets.
It also has a relatively robust forwarding rate of 90 Mpps and the capability of having twelve 10-GBps connections, with an oversubscription rate of 2:1.
Given all this, but without specific experience using this set up, I would say that you should be OK. [EDIT]
03-28-2009 08:16 AM
Will those switches be accepting full Internet routing tables? Or is this a MP-BGP deployment over an MPLS cloud, in which the only BGP routes being learned would be the ones advertised by the remote site?
[EDIT] Just re-read and noticed that you said "small BGP table." Sorry. and yes, the 3560 does support layer 3 switching in its "IP Services" and "Advanced IP Services" feature sets.
It also has a relatively robust forwarding rate of 90 Mpps and the capability of having twelve 10-GBps connections, with an oversubscription rate of 2:1.
Given all this, but without specific experience using this set up, I would say that you should be OK. [EDIT]
03-28-2009 09:01 AM
Thanks for your answer. I assumed that it would work okay but just wanted a second opinon. Traffic levels will most likely be low for a while so we can monitor the system resources and upgrade if needed.
To clarify the "small BGP table", the ISP would most likely be sending us only a default route. If not, the IPVPN is for a small private network with only a few routes.
03-28-2009 09:11 AM
Good luck and thanks for the rating.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide