05-02-2016 01:09 AM - edited 03-05-2019 03:55 AM
Hi,
I been trying to set up LISP+GETVPN instead of DMVPN. The plan is to have two LISP-HUB and have around 3-4 mobility LISP-ROUTERS. I notice that this works very well as long as the mobility routers isnt behind a NAT. If one of the mobility routers is behind a NAT i notice that the HUB is trying to respond to the private RFC1918 IP. Which ofcourse doesnt go so well :) I been reading that this is a common problem with NAT LISP. I notice that cisco have implemented a NAT traversal option that is disable when you type "show ip lisp". Does anyone know when a solution is coming for this or if there is a solution already?
Regards,
Tob
05-06-2016 01:31 AM
Change to using IPv6 ...
05-06-2016 04:31 AM
Yes, that would be lovely :) Problem is that the nodes are mobile so they can end up a little here and there. So i cant guarantee the network infront of the node.
//Tob
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide