12-01-2017 01:41 PM - edited 03-05-2019 09:34 AM
Does anyone know if this configuration would work or would NAT get conflicts? I know you can combine them on a single ACL however there is a much much larger story behind the need for 2 separate ACL's.
ip access-list extended LIST1
permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 host 1.1.1.1
ip access-list extended LIST2
permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 host 2.2.2.2
ip nat inside source list LIST1 interface g0/1.100 overload
ip nat inside source list LIST2 interface g0/1.100 overload
12-01-2017 05:38 PM
12-02-2017 06:53 PM
Hi
I agree with Francesco it will work, now as he mentioned you could use just one ACL to include both entries.
ip access-list extended LIST
permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 host 1.1.1.1
permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 host 2.2.2.2
ip nat inside source list LIST interface g0/1.100 overload
:-)
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide