cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
8080
Views
4
Helpful
7
Replies

Need to configure BGP between primary and secondary circuit to two ISP's

nany96901
Level 1
Level 1

i have one router connected to two ISPs links(Airtel and Reliance), both are of same link speed (310 Mbps each), 

With below configuration (example), outbound traffic and inbound traffic  is through reliance link.

When i shutdown reliance link, only outbound traffic is moving through Airtel but no inbound traffic from Airtel isp even though clearing BGP Sessions

 

MY QUESTION IS THAT : what are configuration changes to be made for making both links for transmitting oubound traffic, but make reliance as primary link and Airtel as secondary link for inbound ..

 

router bgp ****
 no bgp default ipv4-unicast
 no bgp enforce-first-as
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax
 neighbor 192.168.1.2 remote-as 1234
 neighbor 192.168.1.2 description Airtel
 neighbor 192.168.1.2 timers 10 30 20
 neighbor 172.16.1.2 remote-as 56789
 neighbor 172.16.1.2 description RELIANCE
 !
 address-family ipv4
  no synchronization
  bgp dmzlink-bw
  network 1.1.1.0
  network 2.1.1.0
  neighbor 192.168.1.2 activate
  neighbor 192.168.1.2 route-map PREPEND out
  neighbor 192.168.1.2 dmzlink-bw
  neighbor 172.16.1.2 activate
  neighbor 172.16.1.2 weight 10
  neighbor 172.16.1.2 dmzlink-bw
  maximum-paths 2
  no auto-summary
 exit-address-family

!

route-map PREPEND permit 10
 set as-path prepend 1234 1234 1234

!

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

As Rick pointed out, this command:

neighbor 172.16.1.2 weight 10

is preventing BGP to use both links for outband traffic.

But I'm also concerned by your statement that:

"When i shutdown reliance link, only outbound traffic is moving through Airtel but no inbound traffic from Airtel isp even though clearing BGP Sessions"

This is definitely not good and I think this is caused by your route-map. Your AS prepending is WRONG:

 neighbor 192.168.1.2 description Airtel
  neighbor 192.168.1.2 route-map PREPEND out

route-map PREPEND permit 10
 set as-path prepend 1234 1234 1234

You can't use peer AS to prepend, you need to use your own local AS. Your prepending is causing Airtel to drop this route because peer is seeing own AS in BGP update.

So to accomplish your goals please remove weight command and modify prepend route-map. If you see any issues after that please provide output of show ip bgp

Best Regards Please rate all helpful posts and close solved questions

View solution in original post

7 Replies 7

nany96901
Level 1
Level 1

Please help, i have stuck in this siuation, i need to make use of both the links..

One thing that must be taken into consideration when establishing BGP with 2 ISP is what address space are you using in your network? Do you have your own Provider Independent address space? Or are you using address space assigned to you by one of the ISP? And from the made up addresses in your post we can tell what you really have.

 

When you are using address space assigned to you by one ISP the other ISP may not accept the advertisement of the other ISP address space. It sounds like this may be your situation.

 

HTH

 

Rick

HTH

Rick

Dear Sir,

 

our address pool was not given by any of these ISPs..(taken seperately from APNIC). and those address pools were advertised to both the links...

Thanks for clarifying that you have Provider Independent address space. We still do not have enough information to determine why there was no inbound traffic when RELIANCE was down.

 

One thing that prevents you from using both links for transmitting outbound is this

  neighbor 172.16.1.2 weight 10

 

HTH

 

Rick

HTH

Rick

neighbor 172.16.1.2 weight 10

neighbor 192.168.1.2 route-map PREPEND out

 

Before configuring the above statement, the actual traffic flow (both inbound and outbound ) was through airtel link, and little bit of traffic (only inbound) was through reliance link.

{example: if Airtel inbound was 310 Mbps, only 10 - 15 Mbps inbound was through reliance link}

so to make use of reliance , i used neighbor 172.16.1.2 weight 10 ..........  to make  reliance link for outbound. but still max inbound was through airtel link

so i made use of route-map for making reliance for inbound.

 

but now whats happening is, even though if reliance reached its max limit , no inbound through airtel.

 

if i remove reliance link, no inbound through airtel but only outbound

 

Is route-map creating any issues..?

 

 

 

As Rick pointed out, this command:

neighbor 172.16.1.2 weight 10

is preventing BGP to use both links for outband traffic.

But I'm also concerned by your statement that:

"When i shutdown reliance link, only outbound traffic is moving through Airtel but no inbound traffic from Airtel isp even though clearing BGP Sessions"

This is definitely not good and I think this is caused by your route-map. Your AS prepending is WRONG:

 neighbor 192.168.1.2 description Airtel
  neighbor 192.168.1.2 route-map PREPEND out

route-map PREPEND permit 10
 set as-path prepend 1234 1234 1234

You can't use peer AS to prepend, you need to use your own local AS. Your prepending is causing Airtel to drop this route because peer is seeing own AS in BGP update.

So to accomplish your goals please remove weight command and modify prepend route-map. If you see any issues after that please provide output of show ip bgp

Best Regards Please rate all helpful posts and close solved questions

 

I changed the route-map to my local AS value , now i could see inbound traffic from both the links.(max through Reliance ) as required.

 

if i remove neighbor 172.16.1.2 weight 10 , outbound traffic is taking through Airtel link. reason is  Airtel's AS path metric is less compared to Reliance..

 

for me, outbound traffic should be through reliance, so i made use of weight 10

Airtel link is working fine when Reliance is down.

Thanks Rick and Blau grana , now everything is working as required for me..

one disadvantage is that outbound traffic is not shared between the links when i remove neighbor 172.16.1.2 weight 10

 

 

Thank u all

Narayan

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card