06-24-2013 12:05 AM - edited 03-04-2019 08:17 PM
Hi,
We are in the process of planning and designing our new network.
We have a few servers that have bundled interfaces and will be connected to two FEXs which in turn are connected to two Nexus 7009 switches. These two N7K switches are connected to another remote data center via Fabric Path with redundent links between them. The issue is that these servers need to utilize only one its interfaces because the software which is being run on it requires this.
The two data center locations are required to be seen as one logical data center.
I am wondering if it is possible to use vPC+ between the two data center locations to configure a makeshift HSRP setup making the N7K switch connected to the "active" server interface a sort of active switch while the other is the standby? If this is possible, could you provide a link to documentation that describes this?
Thanks,
Marius
06-24-2013 06:04 AM
Hi,
I'm not clear, you have vPC+ configured between the two data centres today or you plan to use it in the future?
The Cisco Validated Designs recommend either OTV or VPLS as the primary choices for Data Centre Interconnectivty (DCI).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns749/networking_solutions_sub_program_home.html
It is also recommended to localise HSRP to a single data centre and to not allow it to communicate with another data centre. There are several presentations at Cisco Live on DCI and vPC+, for example see the session BRKDCT-3060 from Orlando 2013 on Deployment Challenges with Interconnecting Data Centres.
Don't forget to rate all helpful posts.
06-24-2013 01:27 PM
Hi Sean,
Thanks for your reply.
We are currently in the design phase and none of this is currently configured.
I understand that Cisco recommend OTV or VPLS, but from my understanding that is because most companies can not afford a dedicated dark fiber between the site. We do have a dark fiber between the data centers and therefore fabric path is more viable choice for us.
Also, OTV, again from my understanding, produces more overhead than we can afford to have. so therefore again, we see fabric path as the obviouse choice. Please correct me if I am wrong about OTV producing overhead.
But we have the small dilemma with some of the servers needing to send and receive data on the same interface eventhough they have bundled interfaces. so we are looking into how to get traffic to prefer a defined switch which is connected to the interface that we would like the server to use. Do you know if it is possible to configure the switches so that the other datacenter will prefer to send traffic to one switch rather than the second switch?
Thanks agian
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide