02-17-2009 07:27 AM - edited 03-04-2019 03:36 AM
Is it possible for a server not to advertise its mac address?
The reason I ask is that we have
a tumbleweed server attatched to our
switch..
The gig port shows up up
however no mac-address is being displayed
when issue the command sh-mac-address int gig 0/3
GigabitEthernet0/3 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 0018.b985.c403 (bia 0018.b985.c403)
Description: "connection to tumbleweed"
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX
MC5.1#sh mac-address-table interface gigabitEthernet 0/3
Mac Address Table
-------------------------------------------
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports
---- ----------- -------- -----
MC5.1#
At this point..we can not ping the server..but i can ping the gateway of the server from the switch
02-17-2009 10:57 AM
John
I have looked at the link that you posted and here is the very first sentence:"The address table is built by using the source address of the frames received."
Everything else was about how we might get the destination station to send something. The only way the switch learns the MAC is when the host on the port sends something. To say anything different is to be at least slightly wrong.
HTH
Rick
02-17-2009 11:09 AM
this has turned into a very good thread..
Here is the config on the switch
10.1.13.30
255.255.252.0
10.1.12.1
Here is the config for the port it is connected to
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
description "connection to tumbleweed"
switchport access vlan 12
speed 100
duplex full
there is a trunk back to the router
this is the config on the router
interface FastEthernet0/0.12
encapsulation dot1Q 12
ip address 10.1.14.3 255.255.254.0 secondary
ip address 10.1.12.3 255.255.254.0
no snmp trap link-status
standby 12 ip 10.1.12.1
standby 12 ip 10.1.14.1 secondary
standby 12 preempt
the only issue i see is diff. subnet mask.
02-17-2009 11:34 AM
Richard
It is a little ambiguous where this comes from:
10.1.13.30
255.255.252.0
10.1.12.1
I would assume that it is the address of the management interface for the switch, its mask, and its default gateway. Can you confirm that (or providing the configuration detail of it might be even better)?
The apparent mismatch in mask between the switch and the router may or may not be a problem. They both describe an address space that starts at 10.1.12.0 and extends through 10.1.15.255. We would need some additional details, especially of how hosts in the VLAN were configured to know if the mask is part of the problem.
The main thing that we do not have yet is the config details of the server. Can you get the server folks to provide the output of ipconfig (or similar command if the server is not Windows)?
The previous suggestion about checking for possible mismatch in speed or duplex is a good suggestion.
If attempts to get the server MAC address by ping have not been successful, you might try something different to see if we can get it. If the server folk would disable the NIC/interface and then re-enable it, then the server might send a gratuitous ARP from which the switch might learn the MAC. Or perhaps having the server attempt to ping to some destination would cause it to send a frame to the switch.
HTH
Rick
02-17-2009 11:56 AM
Is the 10.1.13.30 the address for the server? If so, it should be changed to 10.1.12.30.
HTH,
John
02-17-2009 01:23 PM
What's the IP config of the server?
What is the configuration for VLAN 12 on the switch?
Has this Tumbleweed server ever worked before? If so, what changes were done that broke it?
Can you try the command "sh controller ethernet GigabitEthernet0/3"?
Thanks.
02-18-2009 10:53 AM
well it turned out to be a server issue..we think..
we got a separate hub....placed a laptop on it and the server...
the laptop was able to ping the server
so we placed the laptop on the switchport with the config of the server
10.1.13.30
255.255.252.0
10.1.12.1
and the switch config being
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.1.1.35 255.255.255.0
no ip route-cache
!
ip default-gateway 10.1.1.1
and WE WERE able to ping the laptop
11-15-2016 08:36 AM
A possible consideration:
You will need to verify the configuration of both the server and the VLAN gateway. If the subnet mask does not match then the ARPs will not be sent to the correct address. If the server receives a packet addressed to an address that is not it's address or it's broadcast address (based on the subnet mask) it will ignore the packet and therefore not respond to ARP requests. Without that response, the CAM table will not be updated.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide