cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1022
Views
5
Helpful
18
Replies

OSPF Summarisation of Redistributed Static Routes

ryan-barton
Level 1
Level 1

Hi I have the following topology in GNS3:

 

ryanbarton_0-1717687006561.png

Currently only concerned with R1/2/3 which are all in area 0, I have created static routes on R1 as below:


ip route 77.1.0.0 255.255.255.0 66.1.1.2
ip route 77.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 66.1.1.2
ip route 77.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 66.1.1.2
ip route 77.1.3.0 255.255.255.0 66.1.1.2

I have redistributed these into OSPF and have the below config:

router ospf 1
router-id 1.1.1.1
auto-cost reference-bandwidth 100000
area 123 nssa no-summary
summary-address 77.1.0.0 255.255.252.0
redistribute static metric-type 1 subnets
passive-interface default
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet1/0
no passive-interface Loopback0

I want to summarise the 77.1.0.0, 71.1.2.0 and 71.1.3.0 into the summary address summary-address 77.1.0.0 255.255.252.0 but still want to have a specific route to the 71.1.1.0 network, how can i do this?

18 Replies 18

ryan-barton
Level 1
Level 1

Sorry I meant R1/2/3 are all in area 123 not area 0

You need two router to add NSSA area to topology then redistrubte static to ASBR of NSSA area then summary these prefix.

MHM

Thanks MHM,

 

already have NSSA area configured on R3 aswell as below:

router ospf 1
router-id 3.3.3.3
auto-cost reference-bandwidth 100000
area 123 nssa no-summary
redistribute static metric-type 1 subnets
passive-interface default
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet1/0
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet2/0
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet3/0
no passive-interface Loopback0

I can also see the summary route on R3:

O N1 77.1.0.0/22 [110/121] via 192.168.13.1, 00:02:32, GigabitEthernet1/0

 

Just unsure how to also ensure the more specific 71.1.1.0 route is also shown

 

 

Got it' 

I will check how we can get summary and only one prefix

MHM

sorry I can not find solution 
you can use 
summary-add <> not-adv 
to prevent ABR of NSSA to translate some prefix but 
make summary and prevent translate that not work 

MHM

Screenshot (564).png

Hello @MHM Cisco World 

Remove those existing summary's and add the following:

summary address 1.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
summary address 1.1.0.0 255.255.0.0


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

Friend this not work 

When you summary to 1.0.0.0 255.0.0.0

All prefix within this range will not advertise i.e. 1.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 and 1.2.0.0 and so on

That why I answer him, he can not get both use summary abd prevent some prefix 

MHM

Hello


@MHM Cisco World wrote:

That why I answer him, he can not get both use summary abd prevent some prefix 


This IS possible, you just need two summary's, one being more specific related to the "leaked" route, in your OP you have the summarys statements incorrect


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

friend share lab to make it short for all 
as I mention again I have three 1.1.0.0 1.2.0.0 1.3.0.0 I can make ABR not translate LSA7 into LSA5 for only 1.1.0.0 that it 
I can not summary three prefix into one 1.0.0.0/8 and advertise two 1.2.0.0 and 1.3.0.0

that all 
Thanks

MHM


@MHM Cisco World wrote:

All prefix within this range will not advertise i.e. 1.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 and 1.2.0.0 and so on


correct as it is a summary! -  however is you wish to "LEAK" a specific route from that summary from an ASBR you just need to add an additional summary which is more specific to the route you wish to advertise.


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

and He ask how we can do this leak 
I answer I couldnt found solution
if you have answer him with lab 
simple lab three routers 
MHM

Hello @MHM Cisco World @ryan-barton 
I have not labbed this, not access to at this time anyway, but i believe I dont need to the ASBR summary's as I explained should work ...

Based on the  OP the cfg I have previously posed also should work accordingly 


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

Hello

R1 = ASBR
R3 = ABR of the ASBR

So if you make r3 a NSSA ( so NOT a  not-to-totally stubby area)  R3 should receive all the specific routes as well of all the other internal rtrs to area 123 whilst the all other areas just receive a summary

EDITED

R1 (ASBR 123)
router opsf 1
summary-address 77.1.0.0 255.255.252.0
summary-address 77.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

area 123 nssa


R3 (ABR for area 123)

router ospf 1
area 123 nssa no-summary
summary-address 77.1.0.0 255.255.252.0


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

Hello Paul,

 

Thanks for your feedbcak, is there a reason the 2 routers cannot be totally NSSA in this scenario?

 

Kind Regards,
Ryan

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card