cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
501
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

Point to point T1 neighbor priority 0

jim.brown
Level 1
Level 1

Why would a neighbor on a point to point T1 have a priority of 0 when there is no priority configured on the serial interface? For example:

Router2#sh ip ospf nei

Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface

10.192.254.7 0 FULL/ - 00:00:34 10.192.10.45 Serial0/0

Router2#sh run

interface Serial0/0

ip address 10.192.10.46 255.255.255.252

ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 7 00263B352B683B205E711C

no fair-queue

Router1#sh ip ospf nei

Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface

10.192.254.13 1 FULL/ - 00:00:36 10.192.10.46 Serial1/0/0:0

Router2#sh run

interface Serial1/0/0:0

ip address 10.192.10.45 255.255.255.252

ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 7 00263B352B683B205E711C

no fair-queue

Thanks

4 Replies 4

mmolina10855
Level 1
Level 1

Since there is no DR election on "point-to-point" OSPF networks (assuming everything is left at default), IOS considers the routers at both ends of the circuit to be ineligible for DR/BDR status/election and assigns them both local priorities of zero. I suppose it might have been more logical to place a "-" or a "n/a" in the priority column but it pretty much indicated the same thing at the end of the day :-)

I suppose I should qualify my last comment by stating that the priority on point-to-point links does not appear to be consistent (at least not on the devices I have looked at). On some, one end is set to zero and the other is set to 1. On other devices, both sides are set to zero. I would have thought that both ends would be zero everytime but I guess I was wrong.

I am guessing that there are IOS version differences between the routers that assign value 0 and routers that assign value non 0 for OSPF neighbor priority on point to point interfaces.

I believe that the first point made by Martin is the important one. Since there is never any election for DR/BDR on OSPF point to point interfaces whatever value the priority field may have is not relevant.

HTH

Rick

HTH

Rick

Thanks for the reply. I knew that there was no DR/BDR election on point to point links, I just did not understand why the priority was zero. Thanks again.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card