Point to point T1 neighbor priority 0
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-04-2005 06:37 PM - edited 03-03-2019 09:44 AM
Why would a neighbor on a point to point T1 have a priority of 0 when there is no priority configured on the serial interface? For example:
Router2#sh ip ospf nei
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
10.192.254.7 0 FULL/ - 00:00:34 10.192.10.45 Serial0/0
Router2#sh run
interface Serial0/0
ip address 10.192.10.46 255.255.255.252
ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 7 00263B352B683B205E711C
no fair-queue
Router1#sh ip ospf nei
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
10.192.254.13 1 FULL/ - 00:00:36 10.192.10.46 Serial1/0/0:0
Router2#sh run
interface Serial1/0/0:0
ip address 10.192.10.45 255.255.255.252
ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 7 00263B352B683B205E711C
no fair-queue
Thanks
- Labels:
-
WAN
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-04-2005 08:59 PM
Since there is no DR election on "point-to-point" OSPF networks (assuming everything is left at default), IOS considers the routers at both ends of the circuit to be ineligible for DR/BDR status/election and assigns them both local priorities of zero. I suppose it might have been more logical to place a "-" or a "n/a" in the priority column but it pretty much indicated the same thing at the end of the day :-)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-04-2005 09:21 PM
I suppose I should qualify my last comment by stating that the priority on point-to-point links does not appear to be consistent (at least not on the devices I have looked at). On some, one end is set to zero and the other is set to 1. On other devices, both sides are set to zero. I would have thought that both ends would be zero everytime but I guess I was wrong.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-05-2005 01:46 PM
I am guessing that there are IOS version differences between the routers that assign value 0 and routers that assign value non 0 for OSPF neighbor priority on point to point interfaces.
I believe that the first point made by Martin is the important one. Since there is never any election for DR/BDR on OSPF point to point interfaces whatever value the priority field may have is not relevant.
HTH
Rick
Rick
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-05-2005 06:21 PM
Thanks for the reply. I knew that there was no DR/BDR election on point to point links, I just did not understand why the priority was zero. Thanks again.
