02-20-2009 12:36 PM - edited 03-04-2019 03:40 AM
I put the next class map and traffic shapping.
At a time i have ping of 1200 ms and i can see in an application of monitoring the consumption of bandwidth does not come to 50k.
When applied the command "not class voice_256kb" in the interface Serial1/1.3, the ping low to 20 ms.
Do i have something wrong with the configuration?
policy-map 256K
class T
priority 100
compress header ip rtp
class S
bandwidth 32
class e
bandwidth 60
class class-default
fair-queue
random-detect
map-class frame-relay voice_256kb
frame-relay cir 243200
frame-relay bc 2432
frame-relay be 0
frame-relay mincir 243200
service-policy output 256K
frame-relay fragment 320
interface Serial 1/1
bandwidth 2048
no ip address
no ip redirects
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
no ip mroute-cache
load-interval 30
serial restart-delay 0
no clns route-cache
frame-relay traffic-shaping
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
interface Serial1/1.3 point-to-point
bandwidth 256
ip address 1.2.2.1 255.255.255.252
ip summary-address eigrp 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 5
frame-relay interface-dlci 3
class voice_256kb
02-20-2009 01:51 PM
I am thinking that provider don't change all configuration, and i have 64k yet
How do I know if the supplier change the speed of link to 256k?
02-20-2009 07:37 PM
I try to explain mi problem better:
The link of frame relay was to 64k and was expanded to 256k, but i
think that the supplier has not done the enlargement.
At some times when i make a ping, it reaches 1200 ms, and when remove
the policy of the inerface Serial1/1.3, the ping reaches 25 ms.
If the link is even at 64, and increase the fragmentation to 320,
could this be causing the behavior that i have in the link?
Is there something wrong with the configuration that i am doing?
Or, Do the supplier has not done the increase of bandwidth?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide