cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
759
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

Routing 2 ISP's subnets with out failover or load balancing

Steven Peterson
Level 1
Level 1

I am trying to configure my 2921 router to route 2 diffrent ISP's subnets (1 t1 and 1 fiber) they both have diffrent subnets, i have a /28 on both connections

1 is ethernet based attached to ge/01

the other is serial on seiral 0/0/0:0

Both nets terminate to one interface on my router ge0/0.99

on that net are my various firewalls and routers for diffrent routable subnets each with their own fail over policys and routing prefrences

I have tried a route-map but that does not seam to be working as everything goes out the t1 line. regardless of the settings

My question is their an easy way to do this?

I created a route-map that looks like this

route-map setnexthop permit 50

match ip address 50

set ip next-hop ISP-B Router

the access list looks like

access-list 50 permit 24.xxx.xxx.240 0.0.0.15 (this is my ISP-B subnet a /28)

at this point everything still ends up going via ISP-A and works with the ISP-B subnet not sure how this is working

Message was edited by: Steven Peterson

I have attached a small diagram to explain the network a little better

Message was edited by: Steven Peterson

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Mahesh Gohil
Level 7
Level 7

Hi,

Can you confirm where this route-map is applied.

I did not see this applied on interface

int

ip policy route-map setnexthop

Regards

Mahesh

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2

Mahesh Gohil
Level 7
Level 7

Hi,

Can you confirm where this route-map is applied.

I did not see this applied on interface

int

ip policy route-map setnexthop

Regards

Mahesh

that fixed the main issue...

but now i have another intresting issue,

only the first address of isp-b range gets packets the others do not, i would expect that to be a mask issue but my syntax looks ok..

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card