RSPAN Redundant Destination Interface
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-14-2014 09:09 PM - edited 03-04-2019 10:59 PM
Hi
I am installing a product called Forescout CounterACT. This product works by having traffic forwarded to it along an RSPAN vlan. The CounterACT Virtual Machine will be installed as a Highly Available VM in a Hyper-V farm.
RSPAN specifically targets a destination interface as part of the configuration of RSPAN. Should an issue arise where the Virtual Machine is moved to the other Hyper-V farm, the targeted destination port will no longer be correct in the switch config.
Does anyone have any ideas how I can set up RSPAN with two destination ports or have the destination port change?
Cheers
Stephen.
- Labels:
-
Other Routing
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-15-2014 05:50 AM
A NIC teaming can share the load of traffic between physical and virtual networks among some or all of its members, as well as provide passive failover in the event of a hardware failure or network outage
Details:
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1004088
Observe these guidelines to choose the correct NIC Teaming policy:
- Route based on the originating port ID: Choose an uplink based on the virtual port where the traffic entered the virtual switch.
- Route based on an IP hash: Choose an uplink based on a hash of the source and destination IP addresses of each packet. For non-IP packets, whatever is at those offsets is used to compute the hash.
- Route based on a source MAC hash: Choose an uplink based on a hash of the source Ethernet.
- Use explicit failover order: Always use the highest order uplink from the list of Active adapters which passes failover detection criteria.
- Route based on physical NIC load (Only available on Distributed Switch): Choose an uplink based on the current loads of physical NICs.
