08-22-2006 04:56 AM - edited 03-03-2019 01:43 PM
Which is the better solution to use on interface?
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-22-2006 05:05 AM
first of all understand the difference between both:
shaping:
it retains excess packet in queue and then schedules the excess for later transmission over time... the result of traffic shaping is a smoothen=d packet output rate...
policing:
it propagates bursts...when traffice rate reaches the configured max rate, excess traffice is dropped. the result in an output is an output rate appear as saw tooth nature...
so noramlly at client end we have SHAPING and at ISP side we have POLICING...
hope this helps you
rate this post if it helps
regards
Devang
08-22-2006 05:05 AM
first of all understand the difference between both:
shaping:
it retains excess packet in queue and then schedules the excess for later transmission over time... the result of traffic shaping is a smoothen=d packet output rate...
policing:
it propagates bursts...when traffice rate reaches the configured max rate, excess traffice is dropped. the result in an output is an output rate appear as saw tooth nature...
so noramlly at client end we have SHAPING and at ISP side we have POLICING...
hope this helps you
rate this post if it helps
regards
Devang
08-22-2006 05:06 AM
Hi,
What do you mean by "better"? It's not uncommon to use them in tandem.
See the following link for a comparison:
HTH
Andrew.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide