cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
377
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

shape vs. policy

rmv72
Level 1
Level 1

Which is the better solution to use on interface?

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

devang_etcom
Level 7
Level 7

first of all understand the difference between both:

shaping:

it retains excess packet in queue and then schedules the excess for later transmission over time... the result of traffic shaping is a smoothen=d packet output rate...

policing:

it propagates bursts...when traffice rate reaches the configured max rate, excess traffice is dropped. the result in an output is an output rate appear as saw tooth nature...

so noramlly at client end we have SHAPING and at ISP side we have POLICING...

hope this helps you

rate this post if it helps

regards

Devang

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2

devang_etcom
Level 7
Level 7

first of all understand the difference between both:

shaping:

it retains excess packet in queue and then schedules the excess for later transmission over time... the result of traffic shaping is a smoothen=d packet output rate...

policing:

it propagates bursts...when traffice rate reaches the configured max rate, excess traffice is dropped. the result in an output is an output rate appear as saw tooth nature...

so noramlly at client end we have SHAPING and at ISP side we have POLICING...

hope this helps you

rate this post if it helps

regards

Devang

andrew.burns
Level 7
Level 7

Hi,

What do you mean by "better"? It's not uncommon to use them in tandem.

See the following link for a comparison:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800bd8ed.html

HTH

Andrew.