12-13-2013 08:59 AM - edited 03-04-2019 09:51 PM
If I have a nested policy with a child class that matches all traffic destined to a particular location and I am performing shaping on that class to match the bandwidth at the location. Does the service policy applied to that child class require a default class? I assume it needs one because of the fact that all traffic destined to the location is being shaped, correct?
See excerpt below:
policy-map QUE-POLICY
class VOICE-TRAFFIC
priority percent 33
class VOICE-SIGNALLING
bandwidth percent 2
class class-default
fair-queue
policy-map WAN-POLICY
class BRANCH1
bandwidth 2000
shape average 2000000
service-policy QUE-POLICY
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-13-2013 10:51 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Yup, that's how to do it.
One issue to watch for, is if you have more than 10 of these 2 Mbps sites, their aggregate can exceed your 20 Mbps.
12-13-2013 10:00 AM
Hello
Whats you thinking regards the BRANCH1 class-map , Do you wish for it to be in the class -default?
As i see this you have LLQ and bandwidth % applied to the voice traffic and everthing else falls in the class default.
Would this more applicable?
policy-map QUE-POLICY
class VOICE-TRAFFIC
priority percent 33
class VOICE-SIGNALLING
bandwidth percent 2
class class-default
fair-queue
policy-map WAN-POLICY
class class-default
shape average 2000000
service-policy QUE-POLICY
res
Paul
Please don't forget to rate any posts that have been helpful.
Thanks.
12-13-2013 10:03 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
There's always a default class, i.e. it's present even if you don't explicitly define it.
PS:
BTW, if you're shaping for an E1, most shapers (I believe) don't account for L2 overhead. So, if they don't, you'll want to shape up to about 15% "slower".
Shapers vary, based on IOS version, default for Tc. If Tc is defaulting to 25 ms, recommend setting Bc so Tc is 10 ms.
If you're IOS is pre-HQF QoS, using FQ in class-default can distort bandwidth guarantee for other classes.
12-13-2013 10:13 AM
Thanks, this should be the hub router configuration, so the idea is that there are several branches mostly with 2 Mbps connections and the head end is only 20 mbps so we want to keep all the branches shaped according to their link speed. We are running a post HQF QoS IOS so that shouldn't be an issue.
Since I am only accounting for voice traffic in the service policy applied to the child class I wanted to make sure all the other traffic falls in the default class of the service policy and not of the parent policy so that it can be shaped accordingly.
12-13-2013 10:51 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Yup, that's how to do it.
One issue to watch for, is if you have more than 10 of these 2 Mbps sites, their aggregate can exceed your 20 Mbps.
12-13-2013 11:09 AM
Great thanks Joseph, I will look out for that. As always you are the QoS master.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide