Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About Kelvin Willacey
08-18-2017
Stats
Member since
11-18-2009
338
Posts
68
Helpful
30
Solutions
10-14-2016
05:21 PM
Well it would seem that you should be able to browse through the other link considering that the tracked object is down and Internet traffic will be routed to 192.168.0.254 so you might want to check to ensure that the other end is performing NAT your subnets.
Do a show dhcp lease to determine the default gateway and ensure that you have reach-ability to the gateway and a show ip int bri and show ip route. You might also want to change the static route to point to the next hop rather than the interface.
no ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FastEthernet0/3/0 track 10 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 dhcp track 10
no ip route 4.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/3/0 ip route 4.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 dhcp
... View more
10-14-2016
01:05 PM
OK in that case you don't need a NAT pool, you can simply overload on the interface.
no ip nat inside source list 20 pool Internet overload
ip nat inside source list 20 interface fastethernet0/3/0 overload
How many Internet connections do you currently have? You have "ip nat outside" on a single interface so I am thinking your tracking configuration is not required and can be removed.
... View more
10-14-2016
10:19 AM
Does the router get an IP address? Are you able to ping out? I also don't see the NAT pool "Internet" defined in the configuration that you are using to do NAT overload.
... View more
07-29-2016
06:59 AM
Once AS 100 and AS 200 are configured on both R1 and R2 then there will be no issue.
... View more
07-28-2016
01:54 PM
So if I am following at any given time you can have either a phone and a PC connected to a port OR a phone and this other device?
What's the configuration on the switchport of the Cisco switch?
... View more
07-28-2016
01:41 PM
You could use outbound distribute lists on both routers to specify the subnets that should be advertised out each link or you could utilize separate EIGRP processes.
... View more
05-24-2016
05:13 PM
Hey Leo, thanks. That's what I feared. Could you point me in the right direction to modify those settings, thanks.
... View more
05-24-2016
03:31 PM
I am trying to get a 6509-E with a SUP720-3B up and running but there seems to be an issue with sup-bootflash and/or NVRAM. I am not able to save the configuration or format sup-bootflash, whenever I try and save the confguration I get the error below:
Router#copy run start Destination filename [startup-config]? startup-config file open failed (Bad device info block)
I have also tried erasing the NVRAM but no luck, although it goes through just fine:
Router#erase /all nvram: Erasing the nvram filesystem will remove all files! Continue? [confirm] [OK] Erase of nvram: complete Router# Router# 1w2d: %SYS-SP-7-NV_BLOCK_INIT: Initialized the geometry of nvram Router# Router#copy run start Destination filename [startup-config]? startup-config file open failed (Bad device info block)
When I try to format the sup-bootflash I get the error below:
Router#format sup-bootflash: Format operation may take a while. Continue? [confirm] Format operation will destroy all data in "sup-bootflash:". Continue? [confirm] %Error formatting sup-bootflash (Unspecified error)
Does anyone know if this could be hardware related? I have been searching but I have not been able to find anything about the "Bad device info block" error. The switch was booted ffrom an external flash card and is running Version 12.2(17d)SXB11a
... View more
Labels:
02-29-2016
11:36 AM
VLAN 1 and VLAN 10 is in the same subnet, 192.168.10.0, is that correct or a typo?
... View more
02-26-2016
01:30 PM
Are you saying that you want two port channels from one FEX to the same parent switch? I don't think that's a supported topology. I can't recall seeing it in the design guide, although it does seem that it could work.
It seems your only options would be to add all four ports to a single port channel or utilize max-links 4. Are you doing this for over subscription reasons? What type of 2K do you have and is the parent a 5K or 7K?
... View more
02-26-2016
08:13 AM
Yes I believe that is what would happen. The first port group will use the first uplink and the other port group will use the second uplink. The document does state that re-configuring the pinning is a disruptive process.
... View more
02-25-2016
09:58 AM
Yes and no.Yes from the perspective that only one uplink is in use, in your case the port channel, so the pinning-max links sends all traffic over the single uplink. No from the perspective that the portchannel hashing algorithm is what dictates what physical links the traffic will be sent over.
... View more
02-25-2016
08:35 AM
Are those 3750X switches? If so then you can use SFP modules as long as you have the network module.
Are you planning to use 3750X switches to connect to the 4500? If all those connections are fiber then you will have an issue. While you can get a network module that has four SFP/SFP+ ports, two of which can be used as SFP+ for 10G connectivity, this leaves you with only two ports. By my count you have six connections so you will be short two ports.
I suppose you could always use a media converter for those two fiber connections and utilize copper ports on the switch.
... View more
02-25-2016
08:16 AM
Only the LAN base and IP Lite will provide static routing. I'm not sure if the LAN base has support for IP SLA but the IP Lite might.
... View more
10-14-2016
Well it would seem that you should be able to browse through the other
link considering that the tra...
10-14-2016
OK in that case you don't need a NAT pool, you can simply overload on
the interface. no ip nat insid...
10-14-2016
Does the router get an IP address? Are you able to ping out? I also
don't see the NAT pool "Internet...
07-28-2016
So if I am following at any given time you can have either a phone and a
PC connected to a port OR a...
07-28-2016
You could use outbound distribute lists on both routers to specify the
subnets that should be advert...
05-24-2016
Hey Leo, thanks. That's what I feared. Could you point me in the right
direction to modify those set...
05-24-2016
I am trying to get a 6509-E with a SUP720-3B up and running but there
seems to be an issue with sup-...
02-26-2016
Are you saying that you want two port channels from one FEX to the same
parent switch? I don't think...
02-26-2016
Yes I believe that is what would happen. The first port group will use
the first uplink and the othe...
02-25-2016
Yes and no.Yes from the perspective that only one uplink is in use, in
your case the port channel, s...
02-25-2016
Are those 3750X switches? If so then you can use SFP modules as long as
you have the network module....
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 11-18-2009 08:37 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-18-2017 04:00 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 338 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 68 |
Helpful Votes Given To
Helpful Votes From
| User | Helpful Count |
|---|---|
| 10 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 |
