cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
870
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

Unsupported L4 protocol type match

Hello,

I am implementing QOS on cisco ME-3600X-24FS-M and i have problems when i want to attach the service policy on a physical interface

To simplify i have juste 1 class-map in 1 policy-map.. "Access-group"does not work.. :

mpe1#sh class-map
 Class Map match-any class-default (id 0)
   Match any

 Class Map match-all Network-Routing (id 1)
   Match access-group name Network-Routing

mpe1#sh policy-map

  Policy Map test
    Class Network-Routing
      set dscp cs7

mpe1#sh access-lists

Extended IP access list Network-Routing
    10 permit ospf any any

mpe1(config-if)#service-policy input test
QoS: Unsupported L4 protocol type match
QoS: Policy attachment failed for policymap test

Thank you for your help,

Maxime Jego

3 Replies 3

Richard Burts
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Maxime

Would you post the configuration of the interface to which you attempt to apply this? My guess is that it is a layer 2 interface and the service-policy would be applied on a layer 3 interface but it might be some other factor.

HTH

Rick

HTH

Rick

Richard,

First, thank you for reply.

It is really a L3 interface. Look :

interface GigabitEthernet0/24
 description ***: ***-mpe-1 / ***-mpc-1 (gi0/5/0) - 1G   
 no switchport
 mtu 1550
 ip address 10.128.0.70 255.255.255.252
 ip ospf authentication message-digest
 ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 7 0455180F2F0E7F7E2F
 ip ospf cost 10
 mpls ip
 mpls mtu 1540
end

I have opened a case on cisco support and they says me that :

"I have found an internal bug state the following protocols ONLY types can be classified :

L4 - IGMP, TCP, UDP, ICMP, IPINIP, GRE.

Also am trying to reach the developer engineer to confirm that"

So I wait the confirmation but if i can't classify OSPF traffic, it will be very problematic.

Maxime

Thank you for the additional information. It certainly is a layer 3 interface and so my guess was off the mark. It is an interesting (and disappointing) possibility that they layer 4 protocols that can be matched are so limited. Please let us know if you find out more about this.

HTH

Rick

HTH

Rick