cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
390
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

WRED Threshold values on 7304

russell.sage
Level 3
Level 3

I have a 7304 customer edge router with a Gigabit ethernet interface that has been throttled with a nested QoS policy. The outer is used to shape traffic to meet a CDR of 600M. Inside this I have CBWFQ with Priority Queue policy

Premium Class for Voice 70M

Enhanced 1 for Video Conferencing 5.2M

Enhanced 2 for Voice Signalling 6.75M

Enhanced 3 for Call Recording Archiving 10.5M

Standard 501M

Now on the WRED threshold configuration values the Maximum value you can put into the box is 4096. So on standard class we has mapped AF11 AF12 an AF13.  AF11 has Maximum Threshold of 4096 and Minimum of 1366 AF12 has a max of 2732 and a minimum 820 and AF13 has a maximum of 1366 and a minimum of 410

I am seeing random tail drops in the AF11 class (<0.001%). Does anyone know if this value of 4096 is IOS related or is it a hardware limit and I am asking too much of this box. My company policy is to move to ASR1002 for larger demands but that is a big investment.

1 Reply 1

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Disclaimer

The  Author of this posting offers the information contained within this  posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that  there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.  Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not  be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In  no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,  without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out  of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author  has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

There could be several reasons for you AF11 tail drops.  WRED uses an average, so bursting can go beyond what's desired as packets are not dropped soon enough to avoid tail drop.  A variation of this problem, WRED drops packets as they are added to the queue, so here too, flows might not see the drops soon enough to avoid bursting beyond desired limits.  The forgoing issues are compounded when you use large queue limits.

Another possible issue, is all your AF traffic drop responsive?  Non-drop responsive traffic will not moderate their transmission rates which can cause tail drops.

Assuming the AF class is also deprioritzed relative to other traffic classes, a sudden decrease in class available bandwidth can cause immediate queuing congestion; again so quickly, the early drops do not have sufficient time to have the transmission sources slow their transmission rates.

WRED can be very difficult to tune for optimal results.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card