Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Atri Basu
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee




To configure the ASA to send traffic through both ISPs simultaneously.


Problem Description


Usually when a user has two ISPs terminating on the ASA, the ASA is configured for ISP redundancy. However in some cases, the user would like to use both ISPs simutlaneously to send traffic.



Dual ISP Loadbalancing.png



In such a scenario, the best solution would be to use a router. Using route-maps on the router, one can configure the routing in such a way that only certain kind of traffic uses one ISP while the second ISP is used for other kinds of traffic. Although the ASA supports route-maps, because it wasn't designed to support extensive routing capabilities, there are quite a few features under route-maps like source-based routing, which are not supported by the ASA. If using a router is an option then the network would have to be redesigned as follows:

Dual ISP Loadbalancing2.png


If however, this is not an option, then it is possible to configure a very crude form of "loadbalancing" on the ASA. The following two scenarios are ways in which both ISPs can be used simultaneously on the ASA:

    1.  Route traffic based on destination:

As I mentioned aboved, the ASA is not a load-balancer or a packet-shaper. However with the following commands on the ASA, we can route traffic to half the destinations on the internet using ISP1 and the other half using ISP2:


nat (inside) 1 0 0

global (ISP1) 1 interface

global (ISP2) 1 interface


route ISP1 // creates a default route for addresses in the first half of the IPv4 spectrum

route ISP2 // creates a default route for addresses in the second half of the IPv4 sepctrum




    2.  Route traffic based on destination ports:


Dual ISP Loadbalancing.png


By adding the configuration below, the ASA can be set up to send web traffic(http,https) out through ISP2 and all other traffic is sent through ISP1 as shown above.


route ISP1 0 0 // Default route pointing to ISP1

route ISP2 0 0 2  // Default route with Metric 2 via ISP2


static (ISP2,inside) tcp 80 80

static (ISP2,inside) tcp 443 443


sysopt noproxyarp inside // important, otherwise it will cause routing issues as the ASA will start sending proxy-arps for all hosts on the inside.


nat (inside) 1 0 0

global (ISP1) 1 interface

global (ISP2) 1 interface


Important Note: As I mentioned earlier the ASA is not designed to support load-balancing the above solutions are only workarounds and as such not supported configuration.


Awesome! I love it!

Community Member

Is failover still possible with the second example? In the example, is my web traffic(port 80/443) down if isp2 goes down, or can i still use an SLA monitor or some other method to automatically failover web traffic to isp1 that is still up? Im looking for a way to both send specific destination ports out a particular ISP, but also fail them over should it go down. Asa 5520. Any assistance is appreciated.

Atri Basu
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

If you're using ASA code above 8.3 the natting becomes very different, and the above set up may no longer work. If the code is below 8.3 then it maybe possible using SLA monitoring, but I haven't tested it and can't be sure how the natting will be affected.Ideally is ISP2 goes down and SLA monitoring removes the second route, then the static NATs shuold also not function properly, so the nat global should work just fine.

Paolo Piutz

Hi to all.

My goal is to use dual wan (with 2 different ISP):

I would use:

wan1 for all: web, mail, ecc

wan2 only for a vpn l2l connection with HQ.

obviously the wan have to work at the same time.

It's possible with asa 5505? (without a router).

Do yuo know some tutorial for that?

Thank you.



Thank you for posting this. It works fine as what the objective is.

BUT I have some problem, USERS cannot access anymore the servers in DMZ using port 80 & 443. Could it be the static NAT? Or do I need to add a new ACL for ISP 2?

I appreciate any feedback. Thank you.


Configuring my ASA 5510 according the 2nd scenario works very well. My issue is that my remote users connecting using VPN cannot access the resources on the LAN. I think this is because of "noproxyarp" but is there a way to give access to all resources on the LAN?



Nilo Noguera
Please note that in order to have dual ISP support on Cisco ASA 5505, you need the Cisco ASA 5505 Security Plus license. This license provides stateless Active/Standby high availability, dual ISP support, DMZ support, VLAN trunking support, and increased session and IPSec VPN peer capacities. The part number you need to purchase is ASA5505-SEC-PL= or L-ASA5505-SEC-PL= (eDelivery SKU). Below is the list price: 
ASA5505-SEC-PL= (Paper Delivery ASA 5505 Sec. Plus Lic. w/ HA, DMZ, VLAN trunk, more conns.) - USD 850.00 
L-ASA5505-SEC-PL= (eDelivery ASA 5505 Sec. Plus Lic. w/ HA, DMZ, VLAN trunk, more conns.) - USD 850.00 
Please check the links below for your reference: 
Cisco ASA 5500 Series Business Edition Solution Overview (See Table 1) 
Cisco ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances Models Comparison 
Loadbalancing DUAL ISP on ASA 
Best regards, 
Nilo Noguera 
.:|:.:|:. Specialist, Cisco Global Virtual Engineering - Cisco Partner Help 
siva vadakandara

without any doubt , front ending a router is the best solution. However, following is my opinion 

1.  Route traffic based on destination:

possible caveat:

while this option gives flexibility to load share the outbound traffic initiated behind the ASA, however this option will potentially create trouble for inbound traffic destined for NAT behind either ISP1/2.


Example: if a client on the internet with source trying to access (ISP2 IP) Static NAT for web server, this traffic enters through ISP2 and tries to exit through ISP1 (because of the broad IPv4 spectrum static routes on ASA)


This scenario is also known as asymmetric routing and it also defeats the purpose of ASA stateful inspection.

Note1: Because of its default nature, ICMP will work in this scenario .

Note2:Also ASA is not capable of policy based routing(PBR) 

Note3: Outbound traffic in this scenario can also cause problems if ISP1 goes down. The static route towards ISP1 is not going to be removed from route table unless we attach a IP SLA track. However even with the SLA track it is still going to be an issue because it only remove the route from route table but not replace that with 0/0 towards ISP2.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: