03-06-2019 04:02 AM
Hopefully someone can help me or advise. I presently have 2960S switches running in a mixture of edge switches generally running c2960s-universalk9-mz.150-2.SE4-6.bin and mixed 2960S/2960-X stacks running c2960s-universalk9-mz.152-2.E5.bin/c2960x-universalk9-mz.152-2.E5.bin.
The customer has requested that we address security vulnerabilities. Identified c2960s-universalk9-mz.152-2.E9.bin for the 2960S edge switches and c2960x-universalk9-mz.152-4.E7.bin for the 2960X switches.
When upgrading a test 2960S switch to 152-2.E9 I get the following entry in logs at boot up. I don't know if this is a cosmetic issue or hides an underlying issue.
Jan 2 00:00:23.975: *platform assert failure: hwidb->snmp_if_index == ifIndex: ../src-hulc/src-common/hpm_idbman.c: 1964: hpm_register_idb_with_snmp
*Jan 2 00:00:23.975: -Traceback= 487224z 1D8D254z 1CEC1D8z 1CF25E4z 1CF2B84z 1CFB3B4z 1CD00A4z 1D8F614z 179B548z 179B714z 179B864z 495B14z 495D4Cz 214B2CCz 214764Cz
Jan 2 00:00:24.033: *platform assert failure: hwidb->snmp_if_index == ifIndex: ../src-hulc/src-common/hpm_idbman.c: 8461: hpm_register_ethernet_management_port
*Jan 2 00:00:24.033: -Traceback= 487224z 1D8D254z 1CEB6A8z 1D35E70z 1D3D648z 1D8F614z 179B548z 179B714z 179B864z 495B14z 495D4Cz 214B2CCz 214764Cz
I am probably asking for utopia here but ideally I need to identify a stable IOS that will pass Nessus scans and I can confidently deploy on 2960S/2960X edge and mixed stack deployments.
Thanks in advance
03-06-2019 04:17 AM
- Usually if the switch remains functional it can be considered as a cosmetic bug.
M.
03-08-2019 02:20 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide