cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
964
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

ASR920 Untagged Service Instances with STP

The Ed
Level 1
Level 1
How would one go about enabling STP on Untagged Service Instances across multiple ports on an ASR 920. For example, I thought this would produce the desired results: conf t spanning-tree mode mst spanning-tree mst 0 root primary spanning-tree mst configuration instance 0 vlan 1 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0 no ip address negotiation auto cdp enable service instance 1 ethernet encapsulation untagged l2protocol peer cdp stp bridge-domain 100 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1 no ip address negotiation auto cdp enable encapsulation untagged l2protocol peer cdp stp bridge-domain 100 ! end This does not seem to give me the desired result. If I set the service instance encapsulation dot1q 1 STP works, but then it does not accept untagged frames.
2 Replies 2

Would configuring the service instance on a port channel be an option for you ?

ASR920(config)# interface port-channel 1
ASR920(config-if)# service instance 1 ethernet
ASR920(config-if-srv)# encapsulation untagged

First, thank you very much for your response. Unfortunately this isn't a solution to my proposed set-up (however flawed it may be). Sorry for not explaining the scenario more completely. This isn't an uplink to a single switch. It's an ASR aggregating multiple switches and or other network devices, some of which I don't control. For simplicity sake, I only included 2 interfaces in the example, but the topology would actually include 5+ ports in the same theoretical Layer 2 Segment. The goal is to allow Spanning Tree to run to detect possible loops in these respective switches as well as loops caused by them possibly becoming interconnected somehow. The somewhat obvious solution would be to use tagged VLANs and be done with it or introduce a switch for aggregation below it, but that also isn't an option unfortunately. The simple way to think of the topology is an office or a small apartment complex where people are allowed to hook up switches and additional devices. I'm concerned the answer is that spanning tree won't run without the presence of tagged VLANs because that's the conclusion I'm drawing from what I've read, but I figured I would present the question in the hopes someone with more experience than I with IOS-XE would correct me. I realize split horizon would help minimize some of my concerns, but I'm still interested in understanding if the proposed idea is possible.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card