04-24-2025 03:01 AM
all,
I want to have a spare switch ready to swap a failed switch in a stack. I have it configured as a standalone switch just in case a single switch also fails and I need to swap it quickly. People without switch access may need to perform this also.
What I need to check is how a spare switch will join a stack and will the port configuration be synced. Let's say we have this situation:
It would simplify things a lot if the cables into the switch can go back in the same numbered ports, but if the newly added switch retains it's port configuration, that makes changing out the switch take a lot longer. Or if the new switch gets numbered 3 and all the ports start with 3/0/x, then there is more configuration to do. I just want to make it easy for non-network IT staff to change a switch if I'm not there.
Thanks for any suggestions!
04-26-2025 02:55 AM
Hi @P675,
basically replacing a faulty stack member is really as easy as mounting and cabling a new device no matter which stack member has failed. So the short answer to both of your questions is YES.
There are a few things to keep in mind:
Since you only have 2 members in both cases the old remaining switch stays/becomes active and the newly added switch will be standby after successfully joining the stack. Hence the config will then be synced to the new switch as well.
No matter which switch fails the active takes care of assigning the correct switch number to the new member so you do not need to worry about the port configuration.
So the process is really as simple as power-down the faulty device, swap it with a new one, connect all cables and power it up provided that the above mentioned conditions are met.
HTH!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide