cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2063
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

Cisco C9300-24P WAN Link Throughput

Hi,

 

Please assist, how much WAN Throughput does Cisco C9300-24P support if we terminate a 1G ISP link on the L3 Switch, having Network Advantage License on it?

 

IOS running:  Gibraltar-16.12.3

 

Regards,

Aditya Deshmukh

2 Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions

Reza Sharifi
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hi,

 

Peering with an ISP with a Gig connection should not be an issue. Table-8 in this link shows the switching capacity.

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9300-series-switches/nb-06-cat9300-ser-data-sheet-cte-en.html

 

HTH

View solution in original post

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
In theory, you should be able to obtain full port speed on this switch model, but as you mention "WAN" throughput (for example, if unfamiliar with the issues of LFNs [long fat networks], you may want to research that subject a bit), and it being an ISP link, both of the latter often have issues that will keep your from obtaining a gig of throughput. Further, the switch may have insufficient buffers to deal with TCP's BDP (bandwidth delay product [also if unfamiliar with subject, you might want to research it too]) needed to allow TCP flows to obtain gig throughput.

I don't recall (?) switch licenses having performance caps (as do some of Cisco's routers).

View solution in original post

4 Replies 4

Reza Sharifi
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hi,

 

Peering with an ISP with a Gig connection should not be an issue. Table-8 in this link shows the switching capacity.

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9300-series-switches/nb-06-cat9300-ser-data-sheet-cte-en.html

 

HTH

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
In theory, you should be able to obtain full port speed on this switch model, but as you mention "WAN" throughput (for example, if unfamiliar with the issues of LFNs [long fat networks], you may want to research that subject a bit), and it being an ISP link, both of the latter often have issues that will keep your from obtaining a gig of throughput. Further, the switch may have insufficient buffers to deal with TCP's BDP (bandwidth delay product [also if unfamiliar with subject, you might want to research it too]) needed to allow TCP flows to obtain gig throughput.

I don't recall (?) switch licenses having performance caps (as do some of Cisco's routers).

Yes, Tested successfully the throughput of 1Gbps.

 

Have a question in regards to NAT support on Cisco 9300 switch. Can we use it for 1000 Users network scenario and enable NATing on this switch. I have checked the below link:

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst9300/software/release/16-10/configuration_guide/ip/b_1610_ip_9300_cg/configuring_nat.html#id_109552

 

The maximum number of sessions that can be translated and forwarded in the hardware in an ideal setting is limited to 2500

 

Please assist.

Yes, Tested successfully the throughput of 1Gbps.

Good to know.

Regarding your NAT question, first, we need to know if the 9300 for sure support NAT, as I have seen contradicting information about it here on the forum and traditionally catalyst edge switches (3650, 3750x, 3850, etc.) do not support NAT. Also, have a look at this link, as it appears that only the 9500 and 9600 support NAT and I think I have seen cases where you can configure NAT on the 9300 series but it does not work, which means it is not supported.

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9000/nb-06-cat-9k-faq-cte-en.pdf

 

HTH

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card