11-07-2014 07:56 PM - edited 03-07-2019 09:25 PM
Hello,
what would be the reason you would use static routes advertise with eigrp networks on a router?
11-08-2014 08:14 AM
Let me suggest an example where there are 3 routers. RouterA connects to RouterB which connects to RouterC. RouterB andRouterC run EIGRP between them. There is not a dynamic routing protocol running between RouterA and RouterB (perhaps RouterA belongs to one company and RouterB and RouterC belong to a different company so you do not want a routing protocol running between the companies). Let us assume that network 2.2.2.0 is connected on RouterA and that RouterB and RouterC need to access network 2.2.2.0. How would you do that? The easy solution is to configure a static route on RouterB so that RouterB now has access. Then you redistribute the static route into EIGRP so that it is advertised to RouterC and now both RouterB and RouterC have access to network 2.2.2.0.
HTH
Rick
11-08-2014 08:44 AM
Do you redistribute the static route into eigrp for traffic entering router b from router c or traffic going from router b to router c or is for traffic going in both direction on router b?
11-08-2014 09:18 AM
I do not understand your question very well. In my example RouterB knows about 2.2.2.0 because of the static route. We redistribute the static route so that RouterC can learn about 2.2.2.0. So perhaps the answer to your question is traffic entering router b from router c.
HTH
Rick
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide