EIGRP default route

[sindan]

Hi, I have a 3750 at a branch running EIGRP connected to two routers that both have configured:

access-list 1 deny   0.0.0.0

access-list 1 permit any

access-list 2 permit 0.0.0.0

access-list 2 deny   any

router eigrp 1
distribute-list 1 out FastEthernet0/0
distribute-list 2 in FastEthernet0/0

Due to this recently applied config the switch become unreachable from the outside and cannot ping anything. Everything connected to it works fine. I was able to remote into it from a switch behind it and noticed that the 3750 has no default route in the routing table. I do see a default route in the eigrp topology table. Please let me know if you have any idea how to make the switch learn a default route maintaining the existing configuration on the routers.

Thanks,

[Rajeev Sharma]

Hi,

I believe a rough topology diagram with labeled interfaces would be great help to provide you a resolution.

Regards,

RS.

[JohnTylerPearce]

Is this the only interface in which there is an EIGRP neighbor (Fa0/0)? If so, then even if an EIGRP neighbor has a default route it's advertising, it's not going to get in the RIB, because it's blocked by the above access lists. You can however manually add a static route which would do the trick, for traffic that it does not know locally.

[sindan]

Hi, sorry for not making it clear initially, had to run... the above config belong to the routers and the interface fa0/0 was the outside interface of each router ....anyway checked today with TAC and was told there is a bug (CSCte69761) in the switch code (122-46.SE) that is fixed in a newer version (122-55.SE). That caused the switch only to have the default route in topology table but not into routing table. Workaround would be to issue a clear ip route...

Cheers,