cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1519
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

NAT on a 4500 - unrecognized command

billmatthews
Level 1
Level 1

We have a layer2/3 switch (4506).  I have two VLANs, 192.168.1.0 (vlan168)  and 10.1.100.0 (vlan 100).  I need a single static NAT, so that users on vlan168 can access 192.168.1.50, which will NAT to 10.1.100.50.\

I read some docs:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080093f31.shtml

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080093f31.shtml

Those examples start with defining the inside and outside interfaces.  Since these are VLANs, I try to apply this:

int vlan 100

ip nat inside

But I get

% Unrecognized command

We're running a basic image, perhaps it doesn't support NAT? It's cat4000-i9s-mz.122-18.EW2.bin.  I couldn't find a doc that explained standard vs enhanced -- but maybe we would have needed enhanced to do static nat?

Thanks

Bill

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Jon Marshall
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Bill

The 4500 doesn't support NAT or at least up to sup V and i haven't heard of it being added with sup6 or sup7 although i'll do a quick check. None of the current catalyst switches support NAT other than the 6500 switch.

Jon

View solution in original post

1 Reply 1

Jon Marshall
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Bill

The 4500 doesn't support NAT or at least up to sup V and i haven't heard of it being added with sup6 or sup7 although i'll do a quick check. None of the current catalyst switches support NAT other than the 6500 switch.

Jon

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card