07-28-2015 07:44 AM - edited 03-08-2019 01:08 AM
Is it still considered a best practice to configure SVI interfaces on Nexus or Catalyst with the following?
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
no ip route-cache
07-28-2015 08:05 AM
Hi
we follow best practice alot in our global network , no ip redirects and no ip proxy-arp we have set on catalyst and no ip redirects on Nexus SVI
it is considered best practice to turn off no ip unreachable but it will cause you issues when troubleshooting as it works on icmp , if your tracing something in your network and thats set you get a *
no ip route-cache we dont have disabled but we know to only enable it for specific troubleshooting like multicast i think it is best practice to disable on catalyst anyway not sure about Nexus
07-28-2015 08:06 AM
Hi,
I am not using any of the above commands in the core.... some of them at the edge
My thoughts on each command:
no ip redirects - in a well-designed network this should not appear anyway except corner cases... so unless you actually use it you can safely issue the command;
no ip proxy-arp - same as above but I would definitely use this command on the edge.
no ip unreachables - I would say this should be used at the edge - arguably as a security measure; not inside the network where it could be actually useful for troubleshooting.
no ip route-cache cef - I wouldn't disable it as this may impact switch performance (the packets will need CPU cycles for forwarding) - is there any benefit for disabling it? - the only case I am aware of is for debugging packets (which will not show if they are cef-switched).
Traian
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide