07-12-2024 08:30 AM
Trying to understand port channel and Channel Groups. Does it matter that the Port Channel and Channel Group on the main switch is one number ie. 208 and the Port Channel and Channel Group on the uplinked switch are different ie. 8. I thought that as long as the Switchport Trunk VLan and the Switchport mode is Trunk on both there will not be a VLan mismatch.
Thanks as always for feedback
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-12-2024 08:45 AM
Portchannel or channel group numbers (same thing) are locally significant. So, you can use 2 on one side and 20 on the other side. Usually, for consistency and ease of management, it is better to use the same number on both sides of the connection.
HTH
07-12-2024 08:45 AM
Portchannel or channel group numbers (same thing) are locally significant. So, you can use 2 on one side and 20 on the other side. Usually, for consistency and ease of management, it is better to use the same number on both sides of the connection.
HTH
07-12-2024 08:55 AM
Thanks, as I mentioned thought that was the case but wanted to confirm. Don't need a Vlan mismatch causing any problems
07-12-2024 09:55 AM
One by one
Port channel or channel group is local to SW' but engineer always use same number in both neighbor for easy admin and troubleshooting.
Vlan mismatch in one SW between port member and port channel will make PO not work or PO not add port member with mismatch vlan
Mismatch vlan between two neighbor SW connect via PO will make STP blk the all PO or blk missing vlan depend on which STP ypu use.
MHM
07-12-2024 02:09 PM
A side note about Etherchannels.
Cisco switches usually offer multiple load balancing choices; insure you pick one that's best for your traffic especially as some switches default (can vary between switch series) choice might be a bad choice for your traffic.
Also, the LB only applies to egress traffic and the other side switch can use a different LB choice.
07-12-2024 02:15 PM
Oh, and another side note about Etherchannels.
A single flow will only use one link. Multiple flows (ideally) use multiple links, but Etherchannel doesn't do any actual load balancing based on link loadings. So, for example, a dual Etherchannel, usually won't double your effective bandwidth, but you may see about a 50% effective bandwidth improvement.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide