10-10-2013 01:24 AM - edited 03-07-2019 03:57 PM
Dear all,
I would like to apply a Service Policy Input on some Gigabit ports on Cat4500 platform for the following action:
Is this working??? I'm pretty sure that I can do both packet classification and marking but what about Policing/Shaping? Is this possible?
Otherwise how can I achieve that results considering that I've to apply this limit in input on some ports?
Thanks for a feedback
O.
10-10-2013 04:16 AM
Hi,
Classification, marking and policing should be supported on the ingress direction. Shaping is usually on the egress direction, probably not supported. What sup do you use?
HTH,
Lei Tian
10-10-2013 04:26 AM
Hi,
I've SUP7L-E with IOS XE 3.4.0SG and at the ingress port the Service Policy is doing classification, marking but is not working on limiting the Bandwidth using the following configuration (the class-map is based on a ACL):
policy-map TEST
class A
set dscp ef
police 2000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit
class B
set dscp cs4
police 20000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
class DATA
set dscp default
police 11000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
Thanks
10-10-2013 05:00 AM
Hi,
So you are saying the switch took the command, but policer doesnt work as expected? How did you test it?
HTH,
Lei Tian
10-10-2013 05:10 AM
Hi,
Yes the switch took the command and it's on the config... since on the same port we've a similar OUTPUT Policy we 've done some initial test using a speed test with a device that was classified on the class DATA and we've noticed the following results:
- INPUT POLICY traffic was not blocked to 11MB and reach always more speed around 100MB
- OUTPUT POLICY traffic was correctly blocked around 10-11MB max.
tnx
O.
10-10-2013 07:50 AM
Hi,
How's your class-map look like?
HTH,
Lei Tian
10-10-2013 08:14 AM
like this one:
class-map match-all DATA
match access-group name ACL_IN
where the ACL syntax is the following:
ip access-list extended ACL_IN
permit ip 10.X.X.X 0.X.X.X any
the source IP subnet 10.X.X.X is a VLAN where all these ports belongs, but I would like to been able to give to each port the same BW.
Thnaks a lot for your support!
10-10-2013 09:08 AM
Hi,
Are policy-map applied on interface level or vlan based? I think this should work.
HTH,
Lei Tian
10-10-2013 10:05 PM
Hi,
I thought me too it wasd working :-)))... but in fact the traffic in input is not limited
the Service Policy input is applied to each Physical Interface
Thx
O.
10-11-2013 11:31 AM
Hi,
Might be worth also to try a different software version?
HTH,
Lei Tian
10-14-2013 12:02 AM
Hi,
I thought it could be a bug... It's difficult to test/prove it since all the switches are in production and if I'll do an upgrade it is because I'm sure this will solve the problem...BTW the only SW available would be the XE3.5.0...
O.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide