cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
675
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

Route back into same segment request came from?

darndt
Level 1
Level 1

Subnet 192.168.203.0/24 is connected to a 1900 series router. Inside the segment, there is also a Windows server (192.168.203.248) running RRAS that has 192.168.3.0/24 connected to its second NIC. RIP is turned on, both at RRAS and at the Cisco. The Cisco has a static route:

ip route 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.203.248

pointing to the RRAS machine.

Hosts in other segments connected to the Cisco are routed properly to the 192.168.3.0 LAN but hosts inside the 192.168.203.0 segment get destination unreachable. Why and how do I get them to route properly? (If I give each workstation a static route to 192.168.3.0 via the RRAS IP, they get to it fine but I'd like to avoid routes on individual workstations.)

3 Replies 3

dominic.caron
Level 5
Level 5

Can you share the configuration of the router interface

 

Here's the configuration of the router interface:

interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
 ip address 192.168.233.254 255.255.255.0 secondary
 ip address 192.168.203.254 255.255.255.0
 ip helper-address 192.168.103.0
 no ip redirects
 ip nat inside
 ip virtual-reassembly in
 duplex auto
 speed auto

dominic.caron
Level 5
Level 5

try removing the "no ip redirect"

 

 

 

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card