12-18-2017 07:23 AM - edited 03-08-2019 01:09 PM
12-18-2017 07:49 AM
Hello,
Unfortunately, what you are trying to accomplish is not possible to my best knowledge.
A possible workaround would be to split the network on f3/0 into multiple VLANs, and create subinterfaces for each of them on f3/0. Then, each subinterface could be put into a separate OSPF area or into an altogether separate OSPF process.
Either way, what is the purpose of this design? Is it just a study assignment, or is this something required in a live network?
Best regards,
Peter
12-18-2017 07:49 AM
Hello,
Unfortunately, what you are trying to accomplish is not possible to my best knowledge.
A possible workaround would be to split the network on f3/0 into multiple VLANs, and create subinterfaces for each of them on f3/0. Then, each subinterface could be put into a separate OSPF area or into an altogether separate OSPF process.
Either way, what is the purpose of this design? Is it just a study assignment, or is this something required in a live network?
Best regards,
Peter
12-18-2017 08:07 AM
01-09-2024 02:05 PM - edited 01-09-2024 02:06 PM
Another possible solution is "Multi-Area Adjacency Configuration" as explained here: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/open-shortest-path-first-ospf/118879-configure-ospf-00.html
here is the sample configuration (single interface in 2 different Areas):
interface Ethernet0/1
ip address 192.168.23.2 255.255.255.0
ip ospf network point-to-point
ip ospf multi-area 99
ip ospf 1 area 0
end
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide