cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Bookmark
|
Subscribe
|
281
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Understand load-balancing - available routes to same dest not equals load balancing ?

SJ K
Level 5
Level 5

Hi all,

Just a simple question, but it seems complicated to me.

Q1) if I have 2 static route with the same AD etc,


S 192.168.101.0/24 [10/0] via 192.168.100.2, FastEthernet0/1
                                 [10/0] via 192.168.100.3, FastEthernet0/2

Will traffic be load-balance across the 2 interface ?

Q2) I have read up

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/5212-46.html, it mentioned

If the router receives and installs multiple paths with the same administrative distance and cost to a destination, load-balancing can occur

Assuming then in my case above, how does per destination load balancing works ? It wont load balance across the interface already if it is always going to the same destination, isn't it ?

Q3) The same applies for CEF with per packet and destination load-balancing.

In short, can I say

  • routes available for load-balancing to a particular destination network in the routing table (show ip route) just serve as a list available/paths for the l3switch/router to choose
  • the actual load-balancing still depends if per packet or per destination is set

right ?

Q4) in that case, the available routes for load balancing to a particular destination is still done in a round-robin fashion only if

  • per packet loadbalancing is set or
  • packet is send to a new destination

am I right ?

Hope to hear from you gurus soon.
Thank you!

Regards,
Noob

1 Reply 1

SJ K
Level 5
Level 5

Anyone  ? ;(