05-22-2015 01:50 AM - edited 03-08-2019 12:07 AM
Why when connecting two Cisco SF 300-28 ports together via the LINK/ACT ports, will they not pass VLAN traffic?
05-22-2015 04:28 AM
What is a LINK/ACT port and why are the different from a normal port?
Assuming you have setup the same vlans on both switches, you just need to connect them together via a trunk port and ensure the vlans are tagged both sides. Native (untagged/pvid) needs to be the same both sides also.
05-22-2015 05:14 AM
Yes I have all the VLAN setup on both switches correctly.
The Link/Act ports are ports 25/26 on the switch....
If I use any other port to trunk between the switches it works without any issues. I am just interested to know why 25/26 won't work
11-22-2023 05:09 AM
Both ports are uplinks they can not work together u need normal port with a link/act port
11-22-2023 05:05 AM
Well link/act is an uplink used to connect to higher layers in the network but u still can connect link/act in one end and anormal port in the other , hope this was helpful
11-30-2023 11:08 AM
No, there is no link/act port, that labelling just refers to the link/activity LEDs.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide