02-07-2011 09:52 PM - edited 03-06-2019 03:24 PM
All the design documentation refers to three design recommendations:
1. VSL bundle over Supervisor port(s)
2. VSL bundle over Supervisor port and a linecard (distributed VSL)
3. VSL bundle over two linecards (distributed VSL)
I have a situation that uses a quad-sup configuration. I plan on configuring the VSL bundle to incorporate all four of the available Supervisor720 links. Is this a recommended configuration?
Thank you.
02-08-2011 02:43 AM
Hi John,
You can certainly do that. The topologies mentioned in your post are beofre the quad sup support but still exists. You need an extra line card link for VSL if you want to add another redundant layer which you would not want with quad sup.
Please see the Quad sup VSL design white paper below.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps9336/white_paper_c11_429338.pdf
Also see the VSS config guide.
HTH, Please rate if it does.
Cheers,
-amit singh
02-08-2011 09:02 AM
None of the documentation specifically states that you should or shouldn't use BOTH ports on BOTH supervisors.
John
02-08-2011 10:06 AM
Yes, but the documentation only takes minimum 1 port from each sup for the VSL link. That doesnot mean that you can only use 1 port from each sup engine, that's just the minimum configurtion. You can certainly use all the ports avialble for the VSL as all the ports are in forwarding state in dual sup scenario on a Cat6500 chassis. I have also designed the same for one of my customer, i am awaiting the deployment but it should work.
Cheers,
-amit singh
02-08-2011 11:01 AM
VSL design for VSS Quad-sup is documented in following CVD (See chapter 2):
thanks,
rahul.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide