UCS Director 4.1 - Ldap Integration

[creviscrevis]

Hi Guys,

I need a help , because when i configure ldap integration, UCS Director see a restricted three of my Active Directory and in the attach we can see it I need see others all organizational units, could you please help me ?

[rekkrish]

Here are the troubleshooting steps

· The respective domain name abc.com has to resolve from UCSD Appliance

· If the server name is being referring as FQDN then the same name should be resolve from UCSD appliance

· Make sure the name resolution of the respective domain & server resolves to correct IP address and port 389 should be open between UCSD & Domain Controller

· Inframgr logs will show more information about error to troubleshoot the issue more.

Regards,

Rekha Krishna

[creviscrevis]

Hi Rekha,

I saw the configuration and it´s ok

But Search DN is only this below :

Thanks in advance !

Cleverson Silva

ISU - DC Products - EMC

Capgemini | Brasil

Tel.: +55 11 4196-0665 | Mob.: +55 11 98365-9721

cleverson.silva@capgemini.com<mailto:marcos.a.lima@capgemini.com> // http://br.capgemini.com<http://br.capgemini.com/>

Alameda Araguaia, Nº 2.096 – 3° andar

De: Rekha Krishna

Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de julho de 2014 16:03

Para: Cleverson Luis Marques da Silva

Assunto: Re: - UCS Director 4.1 - Ldap Integration

Cisco Communities <https://communities.cisco.com/>

UCS Director 4.1 - Ldap Integration

reply from Rekha Krishna<https://communities.cisco.com/people/rekkrish> in Technology > Data Center & Cloud > Unified Computing System (UCS) - View the full discussion<https://communities.cisco.com/message/158655#158655>

[Damien Gouju]

Hi,

There have been a lot of LDAP improvement in the 5.0 release, it may also help!

[ucsbhtelecom]

Hello dgoju,

In my team, we had unsuccessful attempt to integrate with Zimbra LDAP on UCSD version 4.1. I must admit that our LDAP tree is very custom, but we can't change it. However, my onderstanding (based on NullPointerExceptions in UCSD logs) was that LDAP integration feature was only playground and basic implementation for something that needs to become more serious in later releases.

Currently we plan upgrade from 4.1.0.3A to 5.2, and it should be smooth, but I am really interested to find out if this could bring us improvements and should we try to integrate with LDAP once again.

Kind Regards