Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Is there a way to alloww read-only access to only a portion of the config. I have customers who are requesting read-only access, but i don't want them seeing portions of the config. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Is their a way to create a command authorization set that would allow all commands in the enable mode, but deny a user from entering into the global configuration mode.I see read-only examples of just allowing a few commands, such as show, exit, & de...
Everything I read says that EIGRP summarizes on classful boundaries. When I look at the routing table (with auto-summary turned on), I see classless routes (ex. 10.210.0.0). Can someone explain this to me why this is so. Thanks.====================...
Is it possible for a Cisco device (router or switch) to authenticate to an ACS via an ASA utilizing a Network Address Translation. If so, what needs to be added to a config for this to take place.
is there a way to have netflow send info on specific ip addresses (strictly in the config of a router). I will be trying to do this on a 2801.Any feedback would be appreciated
Marvin,Thanks for your excellent response. I have been racking my brain as how to do this and have not even thought about going this route. This is awesome. Thanks a million.Regards,Dwayne
Hey Rick, thanks. I finally figured out what was going on. We use RSA tokens for authentication. It would allow me to log into the ASA, however, when I would try to log into the enable mode, I would have complications. What I learned as that I ne...
Is there some type of access list that needs to be inserted or something. I can't get this to work. It should be that difficult. I keep getting "Password authentication failed."
But see, in my situation, where I have auto-summary turned on, I am getting none classful summaries. With the example you gave, R3 would be receiving a route of 172.16.11.0, instead of 172.16.0.0.It is confusing because we are using class a networks,...
