Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
i have a cisco 877 which i use to connect to internet & main office using IPSec tunnel, my ISP gave me a single static IP with a netmask 255.255.255.255, but the router won't accpet it & i had to use /24 instead, and some people suggested i might cre...
i have cisco 1841 in main office connected by IPsec tunnel to a branch office with cisco 877, before installing the c877 the ipsec tunnel was working using a 3rd party router now its up but usless as the c877 firewall drops most connections & i can't...
i have a c877 & i did configure it for remote access using cicsco vpn clients & it works but after the connection i can't ping anything other than the router or access any of the network resources, i have done it before on a c1841 & it worked fine
hi, i have c1841 & c877 connected using ipsec tunnel & remote user use cisco vpn client v4.7 to connect to either sites, while the c1841 is ok the c877 accpet the connection but users can't go any further, i can't find where is the problem. Pease hel...
Hi, i am trying to get an ipsec tunnel between a c1841 & c877 to work, and i managed as far as tunnel is up & i could ping other side but when users tries to rdp to terminal server they fail, also live messanger fails too, i am sure c1841 is OK as ot...
i want to get L2L tunnel working between the c1841 & C877 as it was before between the c1841 & 3rd party router. without the firewall problem denying access to users from other site other than this site.here is the config 4 btoh, thanks for your help...
thanks for your reply, here is the configurtion, i am using the ISO firewall, this single IP address is for the IPSec tunnel & Cisco remote VPN client to work.
thanks, for you & aaraon for your replies, i did try the MTU setting, but it was set to auto before, i didn't see any result but i will re-check again, as for me i agress i thing i am missing something with the ACL's, but i had similar ACL on another...
thanks for your reply, but to make a bit clearer, you mean if i have subnets like 192.168.1.0, 192.168.2.0, ..etc i could only get access to one of them, so could set 192.168.0.0 instead as a work around?, will this work?