TradeSecrets
Level 1
Level 1
Member since ‎01-04-2007
‎08-18-2017

User Statistics

  • 68 Posts
  • 0 Solutions
  • 9 Helpful votes Given
  • 79 Helpful votes Received
Recent Badges
First Discussion
40 Discussion Posts
40 Replies
5 Discussion Posts
50 Discussion Posts
30 Replies
30 Discussion Posts
60 Discussion Posts
20 Discussion Posts
10 Discussion Posts

User Activity

I have entered all my internal sub nets in a group called internal IP's. 19.10.0.0-19.10.255.25591.1.0.0-91.1.255.255I also tried19.10.15.0-19.10.15.25591.1.51.0-91.1.255.255But some address's in that range are still blocked and I have to add the IP ...
I noticed CSA does not have a Linux DNS policy. I want to protect my BIND even better. Any suggestions...
Does anyone know how to trouble-shoot state condition false positives.I can't see to find in the logs what is doing this ?----------------------------------------Hosts in state condition Unprotected access detected
Has anyone written a extra protection policy for Linux DNS servers.I want to increase protection to my BIND on our Linux servers.
Anyone interested in trading CSA Polices.I am running V5.2.0.203.We have been using CSA for about a year. I want to start creating advanced protection polices in Linux and Windows.
Community Statistics
Member Since ‎01-04-2007 12:42 PM
Date Last Visited ‎08-18-2017 03:53 AM
Posts 68
Total Helpful Votes Received 79
Helpful Votes From
Helpful Votes Given To