Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello
Has anyone heard if this has been exploited in the field. It seems to be a low CVE and was found during internal security testing?
And it only affects a 9K that is in "stand-alone mode". I've got a pair of Nexus 9Ks in vPC HA mode and also the ...
Hello Friends
I'm touching base on behalf of a client of mine who has a quantity of two 9200L 48 ports switches. However and unfortanetly did not purchase any stacking modules and no stacking cables.
It seems like there are two possible scenarios and...
Hello
Wondering if it is possible to use a Nexus 9K switch as a tftp server to load firmware onto a cat 2960x switch?
In other words, can I push the .binary file to the Nexus 9K then from the Nexus 9K use it as a tftp server to push that .binary fil ...
Hello
Wondering if anyone else out there in the Cisco switch world utilizing CAT-2960x switches and configured for 802.1x showing authorization problems?
Specifically, when a machine gets authorized onto the switch/network, then it is moved to a diff...
Hello
Any users out there running 9.3.9 or 9.3.10 - I have several customers at 9.3.8 and I'd like to bring them up to the latest. Is 9.3.10 mature enough?
Thank you
I did leave out that the 9200Ls will be uplinked to another stack of 2960Xs. Since the 9200Ls cannot VSS, then there is no way to form a port channel between the 9200L switches and the 2960X stack. Sort of like how Nexus does the vPC. I can appreciat...
Option A as stand-alone switches and daisy chain them on the switchports could present serious STP complexities since the client will be setting up a 3-node server farm in Active/Active mode.
Option B would at least eliminate that with stacking, but ...
