Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello all,In the near future I will get the task to renew the network hardware in the data center. So far we have two N5k with four N2k each as fabric extender in use. The two N5k are configured as vPc peers. Virtual machines and servers are connecte...
Hello everyone,Maybe this is a strange question:I have a firepower 7115 with inline pair in and out between two non Cisco firewalls which are running carp interfaces.I have checked the connection events on the FMC but can’t see the multicast carp tra...
Hello all, Maybe someone can help me. We have several nexus N5k in use all with version 7.3. When I look at different trunk port channels I can see jumbo packets everywhere. But the MTU is not higher than 1500 on any of the interfaces. Also in the Co...
Hello dear community,I am currently trying to understand an existing topology and its spanning tree (screenshot attached).This is probably a topology that deviates from best practice.We have two nexus switches and a cat switch in use. nex4(secondary)...
Hello dear community,I am currently trying to understand an existing topology and its spanning tree (screenshot attached).This is probably a topology that deviates from best practice.We have two nexus switches and a cat switch in use. nex4(secondary)...
Good morning @lciccar,Thank you for your message and your questions on my initial question.I was able, through some trial and error + reading, to understand why I could not see the muticast traffic.The logging was activated for that particular traffi...
Thanks for your answer.in the vpc best practices guide it says:A design where L3 device is vPC-attached to vPC domain and establishes L3 routing protocol peering adjacency with each peer device is not supported. Reason is traffic may be blackholed be...
So also in the collapsed core/ aggregation you wouldn’t go layer 3 with first hop redundancy? Just all plain layer 2 connections between access layer and core?
Hi and thanks for your answer. In our current deployment we don’t have any buggy behavior with FEXs.why you wouldn’t do more then two in a row? In my expectations a collapsed Core and 4 access pairs don’t bring any troubles ..i also thought about the...
