Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I will try and make this easy to understand but it will get a bit long, however I don't want to leave anything out.
I am troubleshooting a WOL issue for a customer.
They have a core, distribution layer, and access layer.
Links between core and distr...
I am doing some lab trials with GNS3 to try and work out a better method of redistributing static routes into our network.What I want to do is redistribute multiple route-maps into EIGRP. Below is a run down of what I have setup so far.I have setup ...
Hi,I am working in a environment that is classed as collapssed Layer 3 environment. We have a core 6500 with routed links to 3560's which are access switches.We have layer 3 vlans on the access switches, one for data one for voice.On the layer 3 vla...
I have scheduled Kron backup jobs on my switches and routers. I have scheduled it as below -kron occurrence SaveConfig at 23:30 Sun recurring policy-list SaveConfig!kron occurrence BackupRunningConfig at 23:45 Sun recurring policy-list BackupRunning...
I ended up getting this working with the following - http://cookbook.fortinet.com/configure-hair-pinning-fortigate/
It has to do with the way the Fortinet does it's NAT when using a VIP.
So for example my Expressway-E server has an IP address of ...
Hi Rick, thanks for the post.
I just checked the 6500's and they do have the ip forward-protocol udp discard configured on them, I missed putting it in my initial post.
In regards to the packet flow this is what I have seen.
From the WOL server (SCC...
The switch ports are configured as Trunks, but I do have spanning-tree portfast trunk enabled.
I have also tested on other switch ports that are just access ports, no difference.
Thanks for the reply.
Hi Georg,
The problem is that the PC's aren't waking up. It seems to be very hit and miss, more often miss.
The fact that we are seeing the packet on the switch to me says from a network perspective everything is correct. Would this be a safe ass...
Just an update, put this into production this week.Worked a treat. ROUTER1no redistribute static metric 10000 10 255 1 1500 ip access-list standard redist-default-eigrp permit 0.0.0.0!ip access-list standard redist-ract-eigrp permit 10.10.5.0 0.0.0.2...
