Almost 3 days with no hangout but on failover. For me is useless, as long as I have two ISP and I cannot use them both. I will try a load balance again. ... View more

I do not know how relevant is this information but my RV320 blocks mostly during the night. I know because my Synology NAS and also the Paradox alarm system always announces me when the connection is down. Maybe is because of traffic, I don't know. When the RV320 is "under pressure", during the day (PC, laptops, iPads, iPhones, etc), it works flawlessly. Also, a very old problem, well known by users and, probably by Cisco, is the weird statistics of traffic; that abnormal value of 184...... of trillions of trillions ob bytes, that appears in minutes after traffic reset. Is an old problem, is known but nobody cares.    ... View more

Few month ago, I reverted to 1.3 because, with 1.4.2.17, I cannot access the router, even if the router was online. The only solution was to enable https, with all the mess regarding certificates and security messages :). Yesterday, due to your post, I decided to give it another chance. Less than 5 hours after FW upgrade to 1.4.17, the internet connection was down, with no message or log. The router was in "Load Balance". Is exactly what other users said, that load balance is just a bad joke. I had, and still have, for several years, a TPLink 6020 that worked perfectly in load balance. Absolutely no problem. I bought the RV320 because the transfer speed was better but when I am leaving home for several days, I am still moving from RV320 to TPLink, even is slower, just because I am afraid of losing camera and alarm access when I am out of the city. Is this a solution, to change the cables when leaving for holiday, when I have a "modern"RV320 in my house? Today I will give it a try with failover mode, but for me this is not a good solution because I have two ISP, one with Static IP and 100 Mbps and one with Dynamic IP with 500 Mbps. So is a lose-lose situation: I need the Static IP for the cameras, NAS and alarm system at home but I am losing plenty of speed due to failover mode. Do you have any specific settings of the failover? I mean, those regarding bandwidth or  network service detection?   ... View more

Unfortunately, it hangs every 2-3 hours also on me. The problem is that I reverted to 1.3 and is also hanging few times per day. Load balance is a mess but hangs also on link backup. This router is nothing but a junk and Cisco doesn't care about it at all. ... View more

I don't now what happens. Maybe are regional differences. On my download page is 34,80 MB. I notice that on your picture, versions 15 and 17 are also perfectly identical in size. ... View more

@Chet Prokop It is at least strange because my downloaded version of RV32X_v1.4.2.17_20171030-code.bin is 34.7 MB (36.483.072 bytes) and not 35.628 MB as you mention. Moreover, I noticed that RV32X_v1.4.2.17_20171030-code.bin and RV32X_v1.4.2.15_20170814-code.bin are absolutely identical in size (see the attach). Identical, up to the last byte (both are 36.483.072 bytes). Interesting. I am not supporting the conspiracy theory, but is strange because this never happened on previous versions. Maybe Cisco is just buying some time. ... View more

I tried it and it works. Cisco didn’t anounced anything. 1.4.2.17 is exactly same size with 1.4.2.15. ... View more

I have exactly same problem, after having huge problems with 1.4.2.15 (https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/small-business-routers/rv325-login-issue-after-upgrading-to-1-4-2-15/m-p/3200048#M34064). I am not a specialist but I noticed something interesting: all FW versions for RV320 are way over 30 MB (34, 35, 36 and above). The 1.4.2.17 is the only one under 30, is exactly 25.67 MB (a significant difference), which may indicate that they mounted a wrong version. Very, very disappointed by cisco. ... View more

Exactly same problem on a RV320. Absolutely no way to access the router interface when the wrong certificate is loaded. A friend of mine, who works in computers, manage to solve the problem by accessing the router with TFTP. I think is exactly what the previous reply in this topic reccomended, with the difference that I can confirm it works. ... View more

Exactly same problem on a RV320. Absolutely no way to access the router interface with the wrong certificate. A friend of mine, who works in computers, manage to solve the problem by accessing the router through TFTP. I think is exactly what the previous reply in this topic reccomended, with the difference that I can confirm it works. ... View more