fmugambi
VIP
VIP
Member since ‎07-17-2023
Online
Awards
1
1

User Statistics

  • 264 Posts
  • 2 Solutions
  • 14 Helpful votes Given
  • 24 Helpful votes Received
Recent Badges
250 Discussion Posts
200 Replies
VIP
First Discussion
20 Helpful Vote
70 Discussion Posts
60 Replies
40 Discussion Posts
40 Replies
5 Discussion Posts
Certifications

User Activity

Hello Team,I have topology as attached, I have introduced another interface on the ftd [172.16.40.25] . this is where have configured the new tunnel to the branch site. on the asa have natted 41.206.58.2> 172.16.40.25 on 4500/500 services. i then us...
Hello team, I have a topology as attached, On ASA I have natted ftd interface [172.16.40.25] > asa 41.206.58.2 ; the idea of port-forwarding, for vpn traffic, such that remote branch uses the 41.206.58.2 ip to peer with, but this gets translated to ...
Hello Family, I have applied prefix-list and route-maps as below, ip prefix-list MEB-IN seq 15 permit 10.251.0.10/32ip prefix-list MEB-IN seq 20 permit 10.251.0.11/32ip prefix-list MEB-IN seq 25 permit 10.251.0.13/32ip prefix-list MEB-IN seq 30 permi...
Hello Team, Trying to create a new policy for s2s ipsec vpn on a different interface on a different security zone, but the security zone does not appear as an option yet its already configured on the interface.    
Hello FAM!!, Hope you are doing well. I have topology as attached, Site A is my primary site, site B my backup [DR]. We have clients connected via site A, via ipsec tunnels to the outside interface IP say [101.101.101.10]. Under the encryption domai...
Community Statistics
Member Since ‎07-17-2023 01:27 AM
Date Last Visited ‎04-25-2025 01:58 AM
Posts 264
Total Helpful Votes Received 24
Helpful Votes From
Awards
Cisco Designated VIPs
2025 Network Security
Community Spotlight Award
English Community Rookie, Aug-Oct 2023