Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Trying to learn Segment routing I am trying to setup a SRTE ODN scenario as per the following topology CurrentlyAGG routers are receiving remote AGG vpnv4 routes with BGP next hop as remote AGG's loopbackLocal AGG routers has no r...
Topology BriefThree isolated IGP domains AGG-A, AGG-B, CORE running ISIS level 2 onlySegment routing is enabled on all IGP domainsCORE10 (SRPCE) running BGP-LS all border routers to learn topology from all three domainsFor reachability between PE/PCC...
Intention:Forwarding traffic destined for vrf A & traffic destined for R6 l01(66.66.66.66/32) based on SRTE explicit pathMy SR Policy on head-end router is UP, receiving prefix from remote PE with proper next-hop and color ext community I am new to ...
In above topology area 1 and area 0 is SR-enabled but area 2 is LDP only. I leaking both PE's loopbck IP into area 1/2. I am using mapping server to assign and advertise prefix-sid for 10.10.10.10/32 ( Loop back of PE-10). From lab experience my con...
In the above LAB topology I have 3 MPLS RSVP TE between the PEs( 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8). I like to achieve -- Te 101 is for EXP 5, TE 102 for EXP4 and TE103 is for rest. But all traffic is passing through TE103. Did not able understand the actual cau...
I have created one tunnel from PE1(CORE7) to PE2(CORE10) with the following CLIs. Such tunnel is up and out put of it available on original post. So I think XRPCE can find out the path between the PEs. interface tunnel-te100
ipv4 unnumbered Loopback0...
I am also using 6.4.2. I saw your reply on the other discussion ...https://community.cisco.com/t5/mpls/mpls-l3vpn-over-sr-te-policy/m-p/3777357 Need to try it on 6.5.2 or higher. thanks for looking into it.
I was facing the same issue and came accross to this discussion. It will work normally without area zero, but if CE router is forwarding any inter-area route then it will not be accepted by PE.Solution is:router ospf <process-id> vrf <vrf-id> disabl...
