Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I want to use the WAAS in my network. I’m thinking in the NME-WAE-302 placed in a router. I've seen some notes on the price list for this network module that has the license WAAS-TRN-NM, but SF-WAAS-4.2-NM-K9 require a separate license, this is wher...
I have a configuration similar to that shown in Fig. The area 0 lies between the switches and routers with LAN links of 1Gbps and an area 1 just for WAN links with low capacity, eg 64Kbps So when a packet is sent from a Router3 to Router4, this does...
Currently I have a VWIC2-1MFT-E1 and VWIC2-1MFT-G703 to install a voice link E1, and a Cisco 3845 router equipped with PVDM2-32. The only information I have is that the E1 will be channeled and unbalanced, so I would like to know which of the two...
I have a network with at least 20 GK registered to two DGK. In each GK are register 15-20 GW equipped with FXS card, connected to the local PBX. In this way I can use all phone connected to these PBX and with 4 to 8 lines I can redirect traffic troug...
So what is the needs for SF-WAAS-4.1-NM-K9, I just want to prove the theory for my boss, if the test is successful, much more WAAS device and all needs license will be purchased, but for the test I just need the necessary to make a good lab.
Thank you for your fast answer.I know that this is the behavior of OSPF, but I think that maybe this can change a bit.I already test the configuration that you propose, and work just fine, but reading Cisco recommendation for OSPF design, it is very ...
First of all forgive me for my English.The idea is make each gateway with one or more FXO the default gateway for a technology prefix.In my case is only one gateway so any call that reach this Gatekeeper is transfer to the Gateway, without the need ...