Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
The Meraki teleworker function on the access point acts as a bridge between the connected network, thus extending the into the home. DHCP from the conencted functions seemlessly and you are, virtually, in the office. The Z series teleworker device i...
After spending the weekend deploying IPv6 on an MX using a provider independent IPv6 allocation, I've come away wondering why enterprise IPv6 still feels like an afterthought in 2026.Good:SLAAC works.Clients immediately receive global IPv6 addresses....
Hi everyone. Could I get as many people as possible request full IPV6 functionality using the feedback button, bottom right of screen in the portal.The working I used was:"When will Meraki support IPV6 and BGP advertisements for provider independent...
We are a big company, we have a global bid price, the mx67w is significantly cheaper than the Z. But, although I mention it often, is not the main argument I am making, my main argument is that it is an MX with a different name.
It is not only a basic MX, it is more expensive than the mx67w which will do exactly the same thing. There is no technical reason to buy the more expensive Z series product over the mx67w. If it were to function as the Teleworker function on the AP...
It is a marketing term, it is a pointless device, everything can be done on a cheaper MX, and you get the option of VPN from home. But that doesn't matter, you will just come back with a counter argument becasue you just want to be right.
"Tell me, what does "Teleworker" actually mean to you?"That doesn't matter, the fact that they have a teleworker function in the APs and a teleworker device that functions differently, and, cost more that a better product that does the same job, is m...
