Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi guys,Would you please advise about Meraki best practice for the management vlan? In my test network I have pair of MXs followed by pair of aggregation switches which feed couple of access switches and WAPs...All my vlans are configured in the agg...
Hi All,,,, our company has main AD and some VMs in Azure, I was thinking about using virtual MX there to connect to all our sites via AutoVPN, what is the best practice to do that? and is there any limitation with virtual Meraki MX like the mode, num...
Hi All,,,We have multiple sites (HUBs) where we have Meraki network campus design (HA MXs, Core MS, access MS), each MX has dual ISP(ISP1 and ISP2), there are many clients will be connected to us via non-meraki firewalls (sonicwalls, Barracuda), what...
Hi All,I'm planing to set up meraki network campus design in our company (NAT mode), and I'm wondering if you can help with some ideas, here is what i'm planing to use1. 2 MXs like MX100 or MX250 (Warm spare)2. 2 MS 425 aggregations switches (stacked...
Thanks for help Philip, Actually same here, I'm familiar with AWS more than Azure, I'm looking for 300+ tunnels, do you think the vMX can support that? If not, do recommend any alternative solution??
Oh, got the idea Philip, thanks for help.One of the ends that I need to VPN with is VPC at AWS (there is non-Meraki virtual Firewall sit there), what do you think is the best practice in case I can't install vMX100 concentrator mode there?
That sounds good idea Philip, so you mean is to have 2 firewalls (or Z and non-meraki firewall), where the meraki firewall is facing the public interface to connect to the meraki sites over AutoVPN and act like a router to the non-meraki firewall. do...
Thanks Philip, on my side I'm planning to use warm spare MXs with Dual ISP at each,, but unfortunately I can't control the other side firewall brand.The vIP is working for each ISP individually, correct ? I mean ISP1 will have vIP between the active ...
