Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
we are trying to mark traffic close to the source, by applying the configuration on the switch, as included in the attachment.Object of this config in the switch is to mark with specific dscp values, to be used in giving prioritization across the WAN...
we have a cisco 2960-24 switch running an older ios ver - 12.2 (35)SE5. we are applying qos parameter to mark traffic at the port level (inbound) and thought to apply the qos on uplinks (outbound). We are marking voice calls (MS Lync), critical data...
what is the recommended router in a DMVPN design, for a hub/host site. Looking to determine router (or ASAA) make/model with at least the following the scenario:1 - 15-30 remote sites2 - 30-50 remote sites3 - 50+ remote sitesremote sites use apps th...
I need to verify the following capability of this switch we have installed:We have a source server that needs to connect via Fibre to the SAN switch (9509) then IP to the SAN Array (ISCSI) target which has a 1 GB interface. All this is being done wit...
I am curious if there is a design guide regarding Cisco recommended router make/model based on office size (small/medium/large) where the s/m/l relates to number of devices on the office network creating network traffic, i.e. users, servers, printers...
Hi Joseph,Sorry delay in replying. Agreed, and confirmed that the C2960 does not appear to allow egress service policy settings. At least not with the code we are running. Also, it's my fault about the confusion in using service policy with name 'Out...
Lol, thanks Joseph. You are patient you are correct in saying that we wanted to incoming traffic that matched the ACL to be marked, i.e. if incoming packet matched an ACE in the CRITICAL_DATA, it is to be marked dscp af31, if it matched an ACE from ...
i think i've confused the situation, or i am confused.currently no traffic is being marked with af31. we would like to apply a rule on switch user access ports that says, for example, any traffic destined for desintation IP 10.180.9.16 be marked wit...
thanks again Joseph.can i do this:ip access-list extended CRITICAL_DATA # traffic rules for APPS1permit ip any 10.180.9.16 0.0.0.0 dscp af31permit ip any 10.180.9.12 0.0.0.0 dscp af31#traffic rules for APPS2permit tcp any 206.108.40.29 0.0.0.0 eq 80...
Thanks to Joseph and Antonin for your replies.Joseph, my question for you now is, if i do as you suggest, i've removed the specific destination networks that i indicated were part of either scavenger or critical data.how does you method determine whi...