Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
When deploying wireless access points on dot11b/g, co-channel interference can be minimized by appropriate manual choice of channel numbers across the physical site.In the US, the same methodology applies for dot11a solutions, where manual frequency ...
Can anyone point me to some docs or share any info on how AP's communicate *between* each other when a wireless client attempts to roam between them.Do Cisco AP's behave any differently than other vendors ?I am assuming a simple network here (only AP...
Quick entry level question. I have a large house residence which requires more handsets than physical people. My boss recommends I look into the 500 series Unified Voip gateway 8 User model. My question is: Can I have a phone in each room (22 room...
**BackgroundI have a number of remote sites to manage that have internet connections(based on DSL & 877 routers).Connectivity from the remote router LANs back to HQ LAN is implemented via a standard IPSEC/GRE tunnel solution.Provided each remote site...
Hello,Please could you share your generic config for this - particularly as you say it works. I've been looking for ages for example WDS configs for FAT APs.Thanks in advance,Julian
yep - good link - thanks.Quoting the article, it says the following :- "The new AP should indicate to the previous AP that the client has successfully roamed. This step usually happens via a unicast or multicast packet from the old AP to the new AP w...
Thanks for the feedback On a personal level - I agree with you 100%. Overlapping network address space is a lousy situation. But please bear with me - there are genuine reasons why I'm stuck with the situation "as-is", and cant simply resolve the is...
I agree its a challenge - but its one I have to resolve with the given parameters.Is this problem truly technically insurmountable ?The whole Cisco configuration set is sooo extensible - I suspect there is a way of achieving this.I can imagine a diff...