Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Inside, outside, and two discrete DMZs. Inside 100, outside 0, DMZ1 50, DMZ2 40. DMZ1 -> 192.168.7.0/24. DMZ2 -> 192.168.8.0/24.Wireless APs on DMZ2 - using public DNS, want to hit FTP server on DMZ1 with public address:nat (DMZ2,DMZ1) source static ...
Independent contractor is e-mailing reports (about 120K) inbound from personal Yahoo account. Our C160 reports repeated "Receiving aborted by sender" errors. Version 7.01-010Our timeouts are huge (10 minutes on reject, 30 minutes on accept). This is ...
This is going to be our new Internet router. I expect port 22 to be open for SSH. But, I've got everything obvious turned off. Here is the test config (I dont' have the IP addrs from our new ISP yet):version 15.0no service padservice tcp-keepalives-i...
Client behind a PAT home router, with local address in 192.168.1.0/24.Servers in 192.168.1.0/24 behind PIX firewall.Client uses VPN client to connect to PIX firewall, is assigned IP from 172.31.1.0/24 pool.Client cannot access servers in 192.168.1.0/...
2811 router, multilink frame-relay for Internet. 100 miles to CO for frame termination.I'm working with an Cisco engineer on the MFR aggregation virtual interface that is dropping inbound packets. Six T1's with full CIR. All links clean. Other side o...
Workaround - black hole techniqueIf you packet trace both scenarios, you find the 5.5.5.50 access does a translation, but no translation is attempted for 192.168.200.100. Both then match the ACL.So, put a dummy translation into the NAT statements. I ...
OK, here is an instance with all fake info:PC3 <--> ASA <--> PC2PC3 is 5.5.5.2, WinXP, gw 5.5.5.1PC2 is 192.168.200.100, Ubuntu, gw 192.168.200.1ASA is 5.5.5.1 outside, 192.168.200.1 inside.From PC3, I can connect to the NAT of PC2 at 5.5.5.50 with f...
Cisco VPN client does not support 64bit. See: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/, bullet 5. This is how Cisco is forcing migrations from the VPN client.
I tried a policy NAT, but it wouldn't fire. The VPN terminates on our only PIX firewall. The issue is that NAT is associated with an interface. The untunneled VPN traffic is not arriving on any of the interfaces available to the NAT command, it just ...
