Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi guys, I'm trying to get a proof that my Queueing policy works. I do have Catalyst 9300, so I did apply the Marking policy to one of his end-host interface and then Queueing policy to the uplink. I so see the counters increasing on marking policy,...
Hi everyone, to prioritize port 22 traffic(to avoid congestion) is the below sufficient? Or it is needed to be added bandwidth allocation like # bandwidth 50; # police 200000 conform-action transmit etc? I mean does the switch prioritize packets base...
Hello guys.The question is about prioritizing SSH traffic from my PC to Linux server: My PC with SSH <-> Cat 9300 <-> Cat 4500 <->Cat 3750< - >Linux server I configured policy only on Cat 9300: 1)access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 22 2)class-map S...
I have few a Catalyst 9300 with as VTP clients and Catalyst 4500 as a VTP server.As I understand, pruning enables passing of certain VLANs on a trunk port only if they are explicitly assigned to its access(end-point) ports, but when I run "show inte...
Hi, we have stack of 3 switches, and when switch 1, which is master, reboots: whole stack is rebooted and then switch 2 & 3 come up with default port configuration, switch 1 has all configuration correct(so we have to configure ports on 2 & 3 each t...
Do you have in mind good QoS policy strategy/method for situation 1&2? We have an NMS(uses snmp and ICMP) which falsely reports devices down from time to time because, I assume, egress/ingress port buffer overflow. Seem like "bandwidth" is not the b...
"Second, I see a byte count (does it increment during you testing?)" - , yes the byte counter is increasing. May be I was not clear enough in the previous post, so.Situation 1) switch uplink is fully utilized 10Mbps out of 10 Mbps by downloading one...
By the way, the goal is to prioritize ICMP traffic, so I assume even if uplink is not congested with traffic (let's say downloading/uploading the file not on the full speed of this link), if the egress queues(buffer) is full there will be packet dro...
By not working, I meant packets arriving at my computer are not marked CS2(they are AF21). To test this, I initiate ssh connection to my computerfrom that remote device connected to 1/0/29
Seem like ingress marking is not working, port g1/0/29 and 2/0/29 connected to device initiating SSH, although making policy counters are increasing.. my PC <--> Cat 9300 <-->Cat 4500 <-->[uplink queue output policy Te1/1/1, 2/1/1]Cat 9300 <-->[in...
